Previous page | Contents | Next page
12.1  |  Security Sector Reform
63.  Mr Drummond wrote to Sir David Manning on 14 February to outline key messages
for the US on “winning the peace”.50 Addressing the US request that the UK “lead on
reviving the Iraqi Justice system”, Mr Drummond reported that:
“We have asked for clarification of whether they see this as a short term revival
of existing structures minus the Ba’ath influence or a much longer term reform
agenda.”
64.  The following week, Mr Chilcott informed Mr Straw that an assessment of UK
capabilities in the field of police and judicial reform had been sent to the US, and that
a minute on the subject was in preparation, but was awaiting “greater clarity on UK
commitments”.51 In an accompanying document, Mr Chilcott described the UK
position as:
“No commitment, but UK could consider providing support for UN‑led justice sector
reform, providing we had the right UN cover.”
65.  Mr Straw responded the following day without comment on the UK’s role in
judicial reform.52 The Government has been unable to supply evidence of any further
consideration of the US request.
SSR planning during the build‑up to invasion
66.  In February and early March 2003, the main effort within the FCO and No.10 was
the pursuit of a further UN Security Council Resolution, as described in Section 3.7.
During this period, much of the debate around post‑conflict management of Iraq focused
on the prospect of the UK taking responsibility for a geographical region following the
invasion, as described in Section 6.5.
67.  The MOD Iraq Secretariat briefed Mr Hoon on 10 February ahead of a visit to
Washington.53 They advised that US aftermath planning was “impressive on details”, but
“riddled with holes at the political and strategic levels”. The MOD identified a number of
factors for consideration:
“SSR will be a huge issue, both in dismantling the current infrastructure and growing
a new one. Will the US look to the current Iraqi police to maintain law and order,
or will it train a new force? If US AID [Agency for International Development] are
legally prevented from paying police or military salaries, how will SSR be funded
prior to the utilisation of oil revenues? What will the new security apparatus look
like, and how can it (particularly internal security organs) be made transparent and
50  Minute Drummond to Manning, 14 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Winning the Peace’.
51  Minute Chilcott to Private Secretary [FCO], 20 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Day‑After (Phase IV)’ attaching ‘Iraq
Day After: Guidance for Officials at US Rock Drill’.
52  Minute Owen to Chilcott, 21 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Day‑After (Phase IV)’.
53  Minute Johnson to PS/Secretary of State [MOD], 10 February 2003, ‘Secretary of State’s Visit to
Washington: Iraq’ attaching Briefing MOD Iraq Secretariat, [undated], ‘Iraq Aftermath – Summary of Key
Gaps/US‑UK Policy Differences’.
79
Previous page | Contents | Next page