Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
34.  On 20 January, the MOD Permanent Joint Headquarters (PJHQ) proposed the
creation of a ‘Common Document’ to provide a framework for UK Phase IV 28 planning.29
That was conceived as a “cross‑Government agreed UK ‘manifesto’, from which we
would be able to guide subsequent engagement with the US”. It would also provide a
“mechanism for systematically identifying issues that needed to be resolved”.
35.  The draft described a number of elements of SSR work, including:
disarmament/demobilisation and the future shape of the military;
aspirations for the criminal justice system; and
consideration of the military role in police mentoring.
36.  The Chiefs of Staff discussed the Common Document at their meeting on
29 January and concluded that it “would establish a framework UK policy, which would
… provide guidance to the embedded UK staffs charged with influencing US thinking”.30
37.  The same day, Mr Bowen shared a draft paper on UK campaign objectives for Iraq
with Sir David Manning.31 The paper identified a number of “immediate military priorities”
for the Coalition in the aftermath of hostilities, including “lay plans for the reform of Iraq’s
security forces”. Mr Bowen commented that “it will be important … that we share the
same military objectives with the US, otherwise the strategic direction of the campaign
risks falling apart”. The objectives are addressed in further detail in Section 6.5.
38.  On 4 February, Mr Drummond proposed that a special meeting on “aftermath”
should replace the AHGI scheduled for 7 February.32 That meeting would be used to
co‑ordinate a response to two US planning papers on post‑war reconstruction and
would also cover the “state of preparedness” on a range of issues, including an agenda
item on SSR.
39.  The AHGI appears to have used the meeting to focus on preparing key messages
on post‑conflict issues for Mr Hoon and Sir David Manning’s visit to Washington the
following week.33
40.  A meeting about the post‑conflict period took place at PJHQ offices on 5 February.34
To support the discussion, PJHQ tabled a paper entitled ‘Iraq – Phase IV Subjects’.35
28  Phase IV is a military term that describes the time after combat operations, when activities are
conducted to stabilise and reconstruct the area where combat took place. It can also be described as
“Stage IV”.
29  Minute PJHQ/Hd of J9 Pol/Ops to MA/DCJO(Ops), 20 January 2003, ‘Op TELIC: Taking Forward
Aftermath Planning’ attaching Paper MOD, [undated], ‘Phase IV Planning – Common Document’.
30  Minutes, 29 January 2003, Chiefs of Staff meeting.
31  Minute Bowen to Manning, 29 January 2003, ‘Iraq: Military Campaign Objectives’ attaching Paper
[unattributed], [undated], ‘Iraq: Military Campaign Objectives’.
32  Letter Drummond to Chaplin, 4 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Aftermath’.
33  Letter Drummond to Chilcott, 10 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Key Messages’.
34  Minute FCO Middle East Directorate [junior official] to Chilcott, 6 February 2003, ‘Iraq: PJHQ Meeting
on ‘Aftermath’ attaching Paper [unattributed], 5 February 2003, ‘Iraq – Phase IV Subjects’.
35  Paper MOD [unattributed], 5 February 2003, ‘Iraq – Phase IV Subjects’.
74
Previous page | Contents | Next page