Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
It also raised “serious doubts” about Iraq’s claim that it had “obliterated” the BW
programme in 1991.301
770.  UNSCOM recorded uncertainties about the destruction of Iraq’s “special weapons”,
warheads for ballistic missiles filled with chemical and biological agent. It also recorded
its inability to verify Iraq’s destruction of seven indigenously produced Al Hussein
missiles, and imports of proscribed liquid propellant and major components, particularly
missile engines and guidance systems.
771.  The Commission stated that actions by Iraq “in three main respects” had “had a
significant negative impact upon the Commission’s work”. Those were:
“Iraq’s disclosure statements have never been complete”.
“… contrary to the requirement that destruction be conducted under international
supervision, Iraq undertook extensive unilateral and secret destruction of large
quantities of proscribed weapons and items”.
“… a practice of concealment of proscribed items … and a cover up of its
activities in contravention of Council resolutions”.
772.  The annex on “Actions by Iraq to obstruct disarmament” stated that UNSCOM’s
work in Iraq had been “plagued by co-ordinated efforts to thwart full discovery of Iraq’s
proscribed programmes” which had begun “immediately following the adoption” of
resolution 687 (1991).302
773.  In a “brief summary” of its “current understanding of the evolution of these
concealment policies and practices”, the report stated:
The Iraq Presidency had “collected reports on weapons remaining with Iraq’s
Armed Forces” in spring 1991.
A “decision was taken by a high-level committee”, of which Mr Aziz was a
member, to provide UNSCOM with “only a portion of its proscribed weapons,
their components and production capabilities and stocks”.
UNSCOM “deduced” that Iraq’s policy was based on:
{{providing “a portion of their extant weapon stocks, with an emphasis on
those which were least modern”;
{{retaining “production capability and the ‘know-how documentation’
necessary to revive programmes when possible”;
{{concealing “the full extent of chemical weapons programmes, including its
VX project” and retaining “production equipment and raw materials”;
301  UN Security Council, 29 January 1999, ‘Letter dated 25 January 1999 from the Executive Chairman of
the Special Commission established by the Secretary-General pursuant to paragraph 9 (b) (i) of Security
Council resolution 687 (1991) addressed to the President of the Security Council’ (S/1999/94).
302  UN Security Council, 29 January 1999, ‘Letter dated 25 January 1999 from the Executive Chairman of
the Special Commission established by the Secretary-General pursuant to paragraph 9 (b) (i) of Security
Council resolution 687 (1991) addressed to the President of the Security Council’ (S/1999/94).
168
Previous page | Contents | Next page