Previous page | Contents | Next page
1.1  |  UK Iraq strategy 1990 to 2000
{{concealing “the number and type of BW and CW warheads for proscribed
missiles”;
{{concealing “indigenous long-range missile production” and retaining
“production capabilities, specifically with respect to guidance systems and
missile engines”; and
{{concealing “the very existence of its offensive biological weapons
programme” and retaining “all production capabilities”.
After an incident at Abu Ghraib in June 1991, when IAEA inspectors had
obtained photographic evidence of retained nuclear weapons production
components, Iraq had decided “in late June 1991 to eliminate some of these
retained proscribed materials, on its own, and in secret and in such a way that
precise knowledge about what and how much had been destroyed would not
be achievable”.
Iraq did not admit its programme of unilateral destruction until March 1992, when
UNSCOM had “indicated it had evidence that Iraq retained weapons after its
supervised destruction”.
Iraq stated that “The unilateral destruction was carried out entirely unrecorded.
No written and no visual records were kept, as it was not foreseen that Iraq
needed to prove the destruction to anybody.”
In 1992, UNSCOM had not recognised that the programme “was a determined
measure taken to conceal evidence which would reveal retained capabilities”.
It was only after 1995 that UNSCOM had become aware of “concerted deception
efforts and was forced to re-examine the 1991-1992 period”.
Investigations, including “extensive excavation efforts with Iraq”, “extensive
interviews with Iraqi participants in the destruction”, and analysis of overhead
imagery, had produced “mixed” results. There was “some evidence supporting
Iraqi declarations” but other data raised “serious concerns about the true fate of
proscribed weapons and items”.
Questions arose about the reasons for Iraq’s actions including the following:
{{Iraq made an admission in August 1997 that missile launchers had been
destroyed in October not July 1991.
{{The precise locations of warhead filling and destruction had been revised
several times.
{{Claimed movements of concealed warheads had “been proven to be
false”.
{{Explanations of concealment and movement of retained chemical weapons
production equipment had been “shown to be false”.
{{Iraq had not declared the concealment of “production equipment and
critical components related to Iraq’s indigenous proscribed missile
programmes” in a private villa in Abu Ghraib, until March 1992, when it had
been retrieved and moved by the Special Republican Guard.
169
Previous page | Contents | Next page