Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
provided points which had been passed to Russia, France and China on how the
comprehensive review should be conducted.
617.  In a press statement on 15 November, the President of the Security Council noted
Mr Aziz and the Iraqi Permanent Representative had informed the Council that:
“Iraq has decided, clearly and unconditionally, to co-operate fully with the
Special Commission and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)”.
The decision constituted “a rescinding of the decisions of 5 August and
31 October, and that Iraq’s co-operation with the Special Commission and
the IAEA will allow the return of inspectors to resume all their activities on an
immediate, unconditional and unrestricted basis, in accordance with
the relevant resolutions and with the Memorandum of Understanding of
23 February 1998.”251
618.  The press statement also said that “Taking note of past experience”, Council
members had “underlined that their confidence in Iraq’s intentions” needed to be
“established by unconditional and sustained co-operation”, and:
“… reaffirmed their readiness to proceed with a comprehensive review, once
the Secretary-General has confirmed, on the basis of reports from the Special
Commission and the IAEA, that Iraq has returned to full co-operation, on the basis
of resolution 1194 (1998) and the Council President’s letter of 30 October to the
Secretary-General.”
619.  The US and the UK had already authorised air strikes when Mr Aziz’s letter
was received.
620.  Mr Blair wrote that air strikes had been due to begin at 4.30pm on 14 November,
but President Clinton “had decided to pause” when Iraq’s letter was received. Mr Blair
described Iraq’s response as “full of holes, typical Saddam rubbish”, but early on
15 November action was suspended.252
621.  Mr Blair wrote that Mr Cook was relieved, but he had been “determined to keep
the US alliance intact and functioning at what was a crucial moment”.
622.  Mr Campbell wrote that Mr Blair understood why President Clinton had decided
to pause, “but our general view was that we should have gone ahead”.253 He wrote:
“TB was worried we would end up diluting the support we had. Clear breach would get
us support. If we were signalling we weren’t sure, or it didn’t matter, we would dissipate
it.” Mr Blair and President Clinton spoke eight times over an 18-hour period.
251  UN Press Release, 15 November 1998, ‘Security Council notes agreement of Iraq to rescind earlier
decisions, allow resumption of UNSCOM and IAEA activities’ (SC/6596 IK/258).
252  Blair T. A Journey. Hutchinson, 2010.
253  Campbell A & Stott R. The Blair Years: Extracts from the Alastair Campbell Diaries. Hutchinson, 2007.
140
Previous page | Contents | Next page