1.1 | UK
Iraq strategy 1990 to 2000
items, the
only conclusion was that there was “a high risk that they had been
purchased
and in part
used for proscribed activities”.82
186.
Mr Ekéus
told the Inquiry that he was able to make that report as a result
of the
work of
UNSCOM scientists, including Dr David Kelly.83
187.
On 1 July
1995, as part of a further “full, final, and complete disclosure
(FFCD)” of
its
capabilities, Iraq admitted for the first time to the production of
bulk biological agent,
but not to
its weaponisation.84
188.
In July 1995,
dual-use items were rendered harmless or destroyed, “under
strong
protest
from Iraq”. In November 1995, Iraq acknowledged that the items had
been
specifically
procured for and used in proscribed activities.85
189.
Mr Ekéus
told the Inquiry that, in 1995, Mr Aziz had asked him to
approach
Mr Tony
Lake, US National Security Advisor, to offer, on Mr Aziz’s
behalf, “high quality
information
about activity and planning inside terrorist networks” in exchange
for an
accommodating
attitude on the easing of sanctions against Iraq.86
Mr Lake
declined.
190.
On
8 August 1995, Saddam Hussein’s son-in-law, Lieutenant General
Hussein
Kamil, the
former Minister of Industry and Head of Iraq’s Military
Industrialisation
Corporation
defected to Jordan. He had been responsible for the development
and
manufacture
of Iraq’s proscribed weapons programmes.
191.
Lt Gen Kamil
met Mr Ekéus and two other officials from the IAEA and
UNSCOM
and an
interpreter in Amman.87
Lt Gen
Kamil said that, after inspections had started,
Iraq had
destroyed its biological weapons and he himself had ordered the
destruction of
Iraq’s
chemical weapons. In addition, all Iraq’s SCUD missiles and their
components had
been
destroyed, although two launchers had been dismantled and hidden.
Lt Gen Kamil
also
referred to a nuclear project that inspectors were not aware of, at
the Sodash site,
where
equipment had been buried.
192.
Mr Tim
Dowse, Chief of the Assessments Staff from 2003 to 2009, told the
Inquiry
that Lt Gen
Kamil had claimed that:
82
UN Security
Council, 10 April 1995, ‘Report of the Secretary-General on
the status of the
implementation
of the Special Commission’s plan for the ongoing monitoring and
verification of Iraq’s
compliance
with relevant parts of section C of Security Council resolution 687
(1991)’ (S/1995/284).
83
Statement
Ekéus, 23 April 2011, page 3.
84
UN Security
Council, ‘Letter dated 25 January 1999 from the Executive
Chairman of the Special
Commission
established by the Secretary-General pursuant to paragraph 9 (b)
(i) of Security Council
resolution
687 (1991) addressed to the President of the Security Council’
(S/1999/94), Annex C.
85
UN Security
Council, 11 October 1996, ‘Report of the Secretary-General on
the activities of the Special
Commission
established by the Secretary-General pursuant to paragraph 9 (b)
(i) of resolution 687 (1991)’
(S/1996/848).
86
Statement
Ekéus, 23 April 2011, page 6.
87
Note
Smidovich, [undated], ‘Note for the File’.
57