Previous page | Contents | Next page
11.1  |  De-Ba’athification
The role of the Governing Council
98.  The Governing Council (GC) (also referred to as the Iraqi Governing Council (IGC))
met for the first time on 13 July. Its creation is described in Section 9.2.
99.  At the first meeting of the GC, Mr Sawers reported that Dr Chalabi specifically
thanked Ambassador Bremer for his decision on de‑Ba’athification.92
100.  In his account of the appointment of members of the Council, Mr Sawers reported:
“Everyone on the Council was adamant that Ba’athists were totally unacceptable,
and there is great praise here that we managed to exclude people who had
compromised unacceptably with the Saddam regime. To have included them would
have been like welcoming Nazis back into the German Government after WWII.”93
101.  The CPA and GC had agreed the authorities of the Governing Council, which
described its initial powers.94 They enabled the GC to make policy in all areas, including
on de‑Ba’athification.
102.  At the end of July, a junior UK official working in Baghdad reported to the FCO on
plans to put an accelerated vetting process in place for the first set of senior appointees
to public positions.95
103.  The official wrote that, although substantive work on vetting was to be left until
there was a new Iraqi Government in place, the Coalition had done some preparatory
work. In that initial phase, the intention was that the criteria:
“… will seek to disqualify from key posts only those guilty of crimes against the
Iraqi people. They will be defined with care, taking account of the culture and
methodology of Saddam Hussein’s repressive apparatus. Attention will also be paid
to post‑communist legislation in the three ex‑CEE [Central and Eastern Europe]
countries who have high‑level representatives in the CPA. Their personal views on
the effectiveness of these laws will be listened to.”
104.  The author of the telegram commented that he had hoped:
“… to have these criteria embodied in a new Order … [to] supplement Order No.1
on de‑Ba’athification … [which] might also have allayed the concerns of those Iraqis
who doubt whether the CPA is being sufficiently robust with the remnants of the
former regime (there is a fine line between achieving this and disqualifying – and
possibly alienating – those with skills and experience the new Iraq needs).”
92 Telegram 82 IraqRep to FCO London, 13 July 2003, ‘Iraq: Formation of the Governing Council’.
93 Telegram 79 IraqRep to FCO London, 13 July 2003, ‘Iraq: Governing Council: Analysis and Comment’.
94 Telegram 81 IraqRep to FCO London, 13 July 2003, ‘Iraq: Governing Council: Authorities’.
95 Telegram 1 Security Affairs Iraq to FCO London, 27 July 2003, ‘Iraq Security Sitrep No.1’.
23
Previous page | Contents | Next page