Previous page | Contents | Next page
11.1  |  De-Ba’athification
would be your agreeing a mechanism with Bremer whereby we become a joint
signatory on any CPA decisions …
“At the very least, we must be properly consulted on decisions. This may involve
advocating the creation of a small policy body in which we are represented, to
ensure that we have a say when you are not in town.”
89.  Following a message from Baghdad reporting progress against the IPU’s list of
priorities, the IPU wrote to Mr Sawers on 20 June:
“While we agree on the need to act decisively to dismantle the Ba’athist state, we
need to keep plugging away that it is the system, not the people forced to live in it,
that we want to destroy.”84
90.  On 24 June, Baroness Amos, the International Development Secretary, was asked
about the policy of de‑Ba’athification in the House of Lords.85 Lord Wright asked whether
it was true that the:
“… apparent decision to exclude all former members of the Iraqi Ba’ath party,
however junior, from working is not only causing unemployment to a very serious
extent in Iraq but is excluding from the reconstruction process a number of highly
qualified people who would be very ready to undertake those tasks?”
91.  Baroness Amos replied:
“… the de‑Ba’athification process is under constant discussion. No decisions have
yet been taken. There was a concern that the first three levels should perhaps be
excluded. The implications of that in terms of the administration in Iraq is being
looked at. What we want to see is Iraqis working to reconstruct the country.”
92.  On 25 June, in a telephone conversation with Mr Colin Powell, US Secretary
of State, Mr Straw said that “de‑Ba’athification had gone too far” and the UK was
concerned.86 He suggested that if the same approach had been taken in Germany
after the Second World War, it would have taken a lot longer to establish a working
democracy in West Germany. Secretary Powell agreed.
84 Telegram 16 FCO London to IraqRep, 20 June 2003, ‘Iraq: Priorities’.
85 House of Lords, Official Report, 24 June 2003, columns 132‑133.
86 Letter Straw to Manning, 26 June 2003, ‘Conversation with Colin Powell, 25 June’.
21
Previous page | Contents | Next page