Previous page | Contents | Next page
10.4  |  Conclusions: Reconstruction
57.  In his first report from Basra, sent on 7 August, Sir Hilary wrote that he currently had
no secure communication with Baghdad or London, there were no telephone landlines
and mobile coverage was patchy.
58.  On 10 and 11 August, there were serious riots in Basra. Cabinet Office officials
attributed the disturbances to increasing frustration with the Coalition’s failure to restore
basic services. Ministers agreed that Sir Hilary “should be given such assistance and
staff as he deemed necessary to improve the workings of CPA(South)”.19
59.  At the end of August, Sir Hilary Synnott requested 37 specialist staff and
20 armoured vehicles for CPA(South). He requested a further 44 staff at the end of
October. In his valedictory report in January 2004, Sir Hilary stated that:
“A bid for 37 additional and expert staff … was endorsed by Ministers immediately …
by early January, 18 of the 37 new staff had still not arrived.”20
60.  The FCO did not provide adequate practical support to Sir Hilary Synnott as Head of
CPA(South).
61.  Departments’ failure to respond to Ministers’ demands for additional civilian
personnel in Basra and elsewhere in Iraq is addressed in Section 15.2.
62.  The decision to take on the leadership of the CPA(South) had significant
implications, lasting well beyond the end of the Occupation. The South would occupy the
attention of Ministers and senior officials and absorb the majority of the UK resources
available for reconstruction.
63.  Sir Michael Jay was aware, in particular through his participation in Mr Blair’s
6 March and 17 April meetings, that the decision to provide the Head of CPA(South)
would have significant resource implications. He did not ensure that those were
addressed.
64.  Sir Michael, as FCO Permanent Under Secretary, failed to ensure that the FCO
provided the support needed by Sir Hilary Synnott as Head of CPA(South).
65.  On 15 November, the Iraqi Governing Council unveiled a timetable for the transfer
of power to a transitional Iraqi administration by 30 June 2004, at which point the CPA
would be dissolved. The announcement took UK officials and contractors working in the
CPA by surprise.
66.  The decision to transfer power earlier than had been expected (the CPA’s plans
had extended for some years) had significant implications for the reconstruction effort.
The CPA focused on programmes which could deliver a visible and immediate impact in
support of reconciliation and the political transition process, and shelved programmes
19  Minutes, 28 August 2003, Ad Hoc Ministerial Group on Iraq Rehabilitation meeting.
20  Telegram 10 Basra to FCO London, 26 January 2004, ‘Basra Valedictory’.
537
Previous page | Contents | Next page