Previous page | Contents | Next page
9.8  |  Conclusions: The post-conflict period
52.  UK involvement in CPA decisions about the scope and implementation of
de‑Ba’athification policy is considered in Section 11.2.
53.  In some areas, the UK was able to affect CPA policy through the influence that
Mr Sawers or his successor Sir Jeremy Greenstock exerted on senior US officials. Both
used their diplomatic experience to build connections with Iraqi politicians and contribute
to the political development of Iraq. Instances of UK influence included:
Mr Sawers’ involvement in the plans for an Interim Iraqi Administration, in
respect of which he considered that “much of the thinking is ours”.11
Sir Jeremy Greenstock’s “two chickens, two eggs” plan, which overcame political
stalemate between the CPA and Grand Ayatollah al-Sistani on how the new Iraqi
Constitution should be created. The plan led to the 15 November Agreement
which set the timetable for transfer of sovereignty to a transitional administration
by 30 June 2004.
Ensuring that negotiations on the content of the Transitional Administrative Law
reached a successful conclusion. Sir Jeremy Greenstock told the Inquiry that
he had prevented the Kurdish delegation from leaving, “which Bremer wasn’t
aware of”.12
The level of female representation in Iraq’s new political structures, including the
25 percent “goal” for members of the National Assembly set by the Transitional
Administrative Law, which the UK pursued with some success.
54.  In the absence of decision-making arrangements in which the UK had a formal
role, too much reliance was placed on communication between Mr Blair and President
Bush, one of the very small number of ways of influencing US policy. Some issues were
addressed by this route: for instance, using his regular conversations with President
Bush, Mr Blair was able, with some success, to urge caution in relation to the US
operation in Fallujah in April 2004.
55.  But the channel of communication between Prime Minister and President should be
reserved for the most strategic and most intractable issues. It is not the right mechanism
for day-to-day policy-making or an effective way of making tactical decisions.
56.  It is impossible to say whether a greater and more formal UK input to CPA decisions
would have led to better outcomes. But it is clear that the UK’s ability to influence
decisions made by the CPA was not commensurate with its responsibilities as joint
Occupying Power.
A decline in security
57.  From early June 2003, and throughout the summer, there were signs that security
in both Baghdad and the South was deteriorating. The MOD’s Strategic Planning
11 Telegram 028 IraqRep to FCO London, 1 June 2003, ‘Iraq: Political Process’.
12  Private hearing, 26 May 2010, page 64.
479
Previous page | Contents | Next page