Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
19.  Although the implementation of tactical plans to deal with lawlessness was properly
the responsibility of in-theatre commanders, it was the responsibility of the Chief of the
Defence Staff and the Chief of Joint Operations to ensure that appropriate Rules of
Engagement were set, and preparations made, to equip commanders on the ground
to deal with it effectively. They should have ensured that those steps were taken.
20.  The impact of looting was felt primarily by the Iraqi population rather than by
Coalition Forces. The latter initially experienced a “honeymoon period”,5 although the
situation was far from stabilised.
21.  Lt Gen Reith anticipated that UK forces could be reduced to a medium scale
effort by the autumn, when he expected the campaign to have reached “some form
of ‘steady-state’”.6
22.  The JIC correctly judged on 16 April that the local population had high hopes that
the Coalition would rapidly improve their lives and that “resentment of the Coalition …
could grow quickly if it is seen to be ineffective, either politically or militarily. Such
resentment could lead to violence.”7
23.  By the end of April, Mr Geoff Hoon, the Defence Secretary, had announced that
UK troop levels would fall to between 25,000 and 30,000 by the middle of May, from
an initial peak of around 46,000.
24.  Consequently, by the start of May there was a clearly articulated expectation of a
rapid drawdown of UK forces by the autumn despite the identified risk that the consent
of the local population was built on potentially vulnerable foundations, which could be
undermined rapidly and with serious consequences.
Looting in Baghdad
25.  In the absence of a functioning Iraqi police force and criminal justice system, and
without a clear Coalition Phase IV plan, looting and score-settling became a serious
problem in Baghdad soon after the regime fell. The looting of ministry buildings
and damage to state-owned infrastructure in particular added to the challenges
of the Occupation.
26.  Reflecting in June 2004, Mr David Richmond, the Prime Minister’s Special
Representative on Iraq from March to June 2004, judged that the failure to crack down
on looting in Baghdad in April 2003 released “a crime wave which the Coalition has
never been able to bring fully under control”.8
5  Public hearing Walker, 1 February 2010, page 16.
6  Minute Reith to SECCOS, 14 April 2003, ‘Phase 4: Roulement/Recovery of UK Forces’ attaching Paper
CJO, 14 April 2003, ‘Phase 4 – Roulement/Recovery of UK Land Forces’.
7  JIC Assessment, 16 April 2003, ‘Iraq: The Initial Landscape Post-Saddam’.
8  Telegram 359 IraqRep to FCO London, 28 June 2004, ‘Iraq: Valedictory: The End of Occupation’.
474
Previous page | Contents | Next page