Previous page | Contents | Next page
9.7  |  May 2008 to October 2009
contributes positively to stable world energy markets by maximising its potential
as a producer and exporter of oil and gas, and increases EU energy security
through developing new supply routes.”
328.  In order to achieve these objectives, the paper suggested that it was essential that
Iraq should remain a single entity; be capable of representing and serving the interests
of all its communities effectively; be able to defend its own borders and maintain internal
and external security; and have a functioning economy, which would require agreement
on the Hydrocarbons Law.
329.  It was also highly desirable that Iraq should be “a broadly democratic state”, should
address critical humanitarian issues (in particular the large number of refugees and
displaced people) and should develop a strong and open market economy.
330.  The main strategic risk identified was “the inability of the Iraqi leadership and
parties to rise above sectarian or partisan motivations and work in the interest of the
whole of Iraq”. The main operational risk was the security situation, which remained
“inimical to normal civilian operations”, so keeping the cost of operating in Iraq high.
331.  An annex to the main paper described further “problem areas”, including:
“Fundamental questions about Iraq’s future have not yet been settled. There is
still no broad agreement between a critical mass of Iraqi actors on the extent
of centralism versus devolution (both economic and political); the nature of the
relationships between Sunni and Shia, and between Arabs and Kurd … In addition,
serious doubts remain about the willingness and ability of Iraqi leaders to effect
reconciliation between Iraq’s main communities and encourage an inclusive and fair
political process.”
332.  The strategy paper set out the elements of the future relationship, in broadly
similar terms to those identified in the Cabinet Office paper for NSID. The main
difference was the specific addition of counter-terrorism and the processing of voluntary
and compulsory returns of migrants to Iraq, including the Kurdish Region. The paper
stated that:
“The UK … are no longer in a position to dictate political, economic and security
outcomes in Iraq … however, we have a clear interest in these outcomes insofar as
they affect Iraq’s security, stability, prosperity and governance. We therefore need
to remain politically engaged and seek to maximise our influence over Iraqi choices
on issues such as reconciliation, energy sector development and Kirkuk which are
fundamental to the future nature of the Iraqi state. This will only be possible if the
Iraqis believe we take the relationship seriously …
“UK assistance to Iraq should increasingly aim to support the Iraqis in ways they find
useful and persuade them to leverage their own resources … Elements of training
and capacity-building assistance can continue to be offered outside Iraq. But overall,
435
Previous page | Contents | Next page