Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
198.  On 12 September, an official from the FCO Iraq Group reported to Mr Miliband’s
Private Secretary that Ambassador Satterfield had visited London two days earlier and
provided UK officials in the FCO, the MOD and the Cabinet Office with an update on the
negotiation of the US/Iraq SOFA.71 Ambassador Satterfield had advised Washington that
agreement would not be possible without US compromise on three points: jurisdiction,
detention and timelines. To resolve those issues, he proposed that:
US military and non-diplomatic civilian personnel would be subject to Iraqi
jurisdiction if they committed a serious crime while off base and not on duty; and
US forces would, in principle, hand over any detainees to the Iraqi authorities
within 24 hours.
199.  Ambassador Satterfield reported that both the US and the Iraq governments had
agreed to a reference in the SOFA that US forces should withdraw from Iraq by 2011,
but the Iraqi Government was keen to have a more concrete commitment.
200.  The Iraq Group official advised Mr Miliband that Mr Browne shared US concerns
about jurisdiction. If the US compromised on this, the UK was unlikely to “get a better
deal”. One possible “fix” was to declare all UK forces “on duty” for the duration of their
deployment to Iraq.
201.  From 15 to 16 September, ACM Stirrup visited Iraq and Kuwait.72 He asked
General Raymond Odierno, Commanding General Multi-National Force – Iraq, whether
he was content with the plans for MND(SE) transition, reporting that Gen Odierno had
been “encouraged” and “comfortable” with the outline proposal though he had yet to see
the detailed timeline. ACM Stirrup “underlined his need to bolster enablers in Afghanistan
as soon as possible” though made clear that any Iraqi transition plan would need to
meet “mutual timeline requirements”.
202.  Mr Brown and Mr Browne met the Chiefs of Staff and Sir Bill Jeffrey, MOD
Permanent Under Secretary, on 18 September.73 ACM Stirrup reported that “remarkable
progress” had been made in Iraq over the past 18 months, although it was “fragile and
reversible”. In the South, the biggest risk was stalled economic progress. ACM Stirrup
reported that the US commanders had high regard for the UK contribution in Basra and
elsewhere in Iraq and were “bought in” to a timetable that would see “two-star UK/US
handover in March and one-star in May”. SOFA negotiations were “stalled”.
203.  Mr Brown said that it would be important to have projects that helped with
employment in place before the UK left Basra, and to establish a UK Trade and
Investment (UKTI) presence there. The main obstacle was not security but the business
71 Minute McKelvey to Baker and Private Secretary [FCO], 12 September 2008, ‘Iraq – Update on
US Status of Forces Negotiations’.
72 Minute Kyd to PS/SofS [MOD], 18 September 2008, ‘CDS Visit to Iraq 15-16 Sep 08’.
73 Letter Catsaras to Rimmer, 18 September 2008, ‘Prime Minister’s Meeting with Defence Chiefs,
18 September’.
414
Previous page | Contents | Next page