The Report
of the Iraq Inquiry
74.
The JIC
examined the state of Sunni politics in Iraq in an Assessment of 11
June.24
It
confirmed a December 2007 judgement that, despite having worked
together to oust
AQ‑I, there
was little sign the Sunni community had rallied to a single
political party
or cause.
75.
The JIC judged
that Sunni participation in the forthcoming provincial elections
was
likely to
be:
“…
considerably higher than in 2005. Sunni expectations are high and
are unlikely
to be met
by the opportunities that political participation offers.
Alienation will grow
unless
Prime Minister Maliki’s government addresses their
concerns.”
76.
The JIC judged
that Sunni politicians commanded little support from “the
Sunni
street” and
that “established Sunni parties’ low credibility and growing
competition
for votes
will probably render them less dominant in national Sunni
politics”.
77.
The JIC judged
that “Iraq’s Arab neighbours are not driving Iraqi Sunni
politics”.
78.
The JIC
assessed that immediate Sunni concerns were focused on seeing
security
gains
translate into more jobs and better public services. Other common
goals included
increased
representation in the ISF and in the government; the release of
Sunni
detainees;
revision of the de-Ba’athification laws; constitutional review; a
timetable for
the
withdrawal of the MNF; and resisting Shia and Kurdish moves towards
federalism.
79.
The JIC
assessed that Sunni insurgent groups were increasingly interested
in
the
potential gains from political engagement, but saw such engagement
“as additional
to, not
instead of, armed resistance”. There was no sign that any such
group had a
coherent or
realistic set of national political objectives.
80.
On 11 June,
Sir Mark Lyall-Grant, FCO Director General Political, circulated
to
members of
the FCO Board a paper on ‘Preparing for the End-Game in
Basra’.25
The paper
set out an analysis of the impact of the Charge of the
Knights:
“– Maliki’s
failure to consult us, and his well-publicised refusal to receive
British
officers
during the first week when things were going badly for the ISF,
made
it hard
for us to sustain our claims that we were co-operating closely with
the
GoI on
Basra, and that our military overwatch role was welcomed and
valued
by the
Iraqis.
– the
increased MNC-I (ie the US military) presence on the ground created
a
mistaken
but widespread perception in the US, and in the international
media,
that we had
abdicated to the US our post-PIC [Provisional Iraqi
Control]
responsibilities
for providing in
extremis support for
the ISF.
24
JIC
Assessment, 11 June 2008, ‘Iraq: Sunni Arab Politics’.
25
Email
Lyall-Grant to Ricketts, 11 June 2008, ‘Board endgame paper’
attaching Paper Iraq Group,
June 2008,
‘Iraq: Preparing for the End-Game in Basra’.
394