Previous page | Contents | Next page
9.6  |  27 June 2007 to April 2008
training the Iraqi Security Forces, although they would re-engage if necessary.” The
transition would enable force levels to reduce from 4,500 to 2,500 by March 2008, at
which point the future position would be reviewed.
678.  Sir Nigel Sheinwald, Foreign Policy Adviser to Mr Blair until June 2007 and
subsequently British Ambassador to the US, told the Inquiry that “we deliberately chose
as a government to accept that as we left Basra it wouldn’t be perfect; it was going to be
rough and ready and difficult. We developed deliberately this doctrine of sufficiency.”315
679.  On 12 December, a junior official from the FCO Iraq Group sent further advice to
Mr Miliband, apparently in response to his request for “more detail on the criteria which
we would use to inform a decision to release the detained JAM leader [JAM1]”.316
680.  The junior official advised that “it is not possible to provide a comprehensive
checklist of things which would have to happen (or not happen) before we decided to
release [JAM1]”. Since the negotiations had always been based on the understanding
that JAM1 would be released at some stage, the question was when to release, not
whether to release.
681.  The junior official went on to explain that:
“… our main aim is to sustain the JAM cease-fire against us, and to secure … a
clear commitment to certain principles. These would centre on undertakings to end
violence and intimidation against MNF, the ISF, other political parties, our LE [locally
engaged] staff and others, and to respect the democratic process …
“We will, as far as possible, seek to secure such a commitment from [JAM1] before
he is released. But the time to do so is limited. In addition, it may be tactically
preferable to release [JAM1] even if he has not given all of the commitments which
we are seeking, either as a mark of our good faith or to increase his ability to deliver
his JAM colleagues.”
682.  At the MOD’s request, on 12 December the JIC examined the strength, cohesion
and prospects for the Sunni insurgency in Iraq.317
683.  The JIC judged that the decreasing levels of violence in Iraq were due in significant
part to a “shift in the priorities of some Sunni insurgents who had reduced attacks on the
MNF in favour of working with it to resist AQ-I as part of the US-sponsored ‘Concerned
Local Citizens’ groups (CLCs)” (see Section 12.1).
684.  The JIC assessed:
“II. Though Sunni Arab insurgent groups remain divided by ideology, regional
demographics and local concerns, factions of several groups are trying to work
315  Public hearing, 16 December 2009, page 99.
316  Minute FCO Iraq Group [junior official] to Jenkins, 10 December 2007, ‘Iraq: [NAME OF OPERATION]’.
317  JIC Assessment, 12 December 2007, ‘Iraq’s Sunni Insurgency: Nationalists and Jihadists’.
307
Previous page | Contents | Next page