Previous page | Contents | Next page
9.6  |  27 June 2007 to April 2008
was fragile, however, and would need to be sustained in order for the current relative
calm to continue.
483.  According to Sir John Scarlett’s own account of the meeting, Mr Brown:
“… spoke very strongly on the cease-fire in Basra and the dramatic improvement
in the security situation. This represented a huge opportunity.”233
484.  Mr Brown expressed thanks and admiration for the work on that initiative.
485.  Sir John recorded that “CDS [ACM Stirrup] argued that we must take the
opportunity to push forward events while the tide was running in our favour”. Mr Brown
endorsed the point that the cease-fire was not simply about prisoner releases; the UK
had to show progress on the political and economic front, on which JAM1 was also
focused.
486.  In a covering comment, Sir John added that the Prime Minister had:
“… personally … acknowledged the importance of [NAME OF OPERATION] …
He also understands that the effort has to move into the political and economic
sphere and not just the security issue. So there are signs of traction at the top of
government; …”
487.  Mr Prentice shared key points from an advance copy of Mr Brown’s statement to
Parliament with Gen Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker, and shared its full text shortly
before Mr Brown began to speak in Parliament.
488.  Mr Prentice reported that Gen Petraeus had been “complimentary” about the
statement, describing it as the culmination of “a good process of consultation altogether”
which has worked out “a sensible way ahead” on UK force levels.234
489.  Both Gen Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker repeated the US concern that the
UK presence should be centred on Basra, not elsewhere in southern Iraq. Mr Prentice
assured both that this was not in doubt: the geographical description “Southern Iraq”
was simply used to distinguish UK forces from those elsewhere in Iraq.
490.  Gen Petraeus also emphasised the need to be cautious about the stability of
improved conditions in Basra: the underlying factors behind it were fragile and the UK
should be ready to respond if conditions required it.
491.  On 8 October, Lt Gen Odierno recommended to Gen Petraeus that Basra
should move to PIC in December.235 He had been encouraged by the positive impact
that Gen Mohan and Gen Jalil were having but remained concerned by reports of
233  Email C, 9 October 2007, ‘Iraq NSID 8 Oct 2007’ attaching Note, ‘NSID Iraq – 8 October 2007’.
234  eGram 41359/07 Baghdad to FCO London, 8 October 2007, ‘Iraq: PM’s Statement: Reactions from
Petraeus and Crocker’.
235  Minute Binns to CJO, 11 October 2007, ‘GOC HQ MND(SE) – Southern Iraq Update –
11 October 2007’.
273
Previous page | Contents | Next page