Previous page | Contents | Next page
9.6  |  27 June 2007 to April 2008
433.  A separate explosion at a Sunni mosque near Basra the following day, which
killed five people, looked to have been a sectarian retaliation fuelled by this belief.
MNF considered that the earlier attack could well have been intra-Shia violence.
434.  On 28 September, government officials working closely with the military met JAM1
again. The day before the meeting JAM1 had telephoned to warn that JAM elements
had identified British soldiers deployed to the north of Basra, and were preparing an
attack.211 The officials alerted MND(SE) and the troops were extracted immediately.
435.  The previous day’s incident was not discussed during the meeting which began
by focusing on an IDF attack on Basra Air Station that morning. The officials reported
that Maj Gen Binns had been talked out of cancelling the release of five detainees due
that day as a result, adding “some still have not quite got the concept that we are buying
[JAM1’s] support and influence to advance peace, not peace itself”.
436.  The officials then asked JAM1 what JAM members were doing while they were
not fighting – was there a risk that redundancy would inspire boredom and restlessness
and increase the chances of further violence? JAM1 agreed that people needed work.
Possibilities might include the Army, the Police Force, manual work on reconstruction or
learning new skills.
437.  Mr McDonald discussed future plans for Iraq with Mr Hadley in Washington on
27 September.212 Reporting on their meeting to the MOD, Mr McDonald said he had
explained the UK assumption that PIC would happen in November or December 2007,
after which point the UK would retain a similar military presence until March 2008
(5,000 troops, 4,500 of which would be based at Basra Air Station).
438.  Beyond March 2008 the UK aspired to reduce troop numbers in stages
over the spring and summer, to around 1,500. That would require “significant US
support in Basra”.
439.  Mr Hadley’s staff expressed concern about the numbers after March 2008. They
indicated that the US had hoped that the UK would retain the lead in Basra throughout
2008; the US had not planned to deploy to Basra in large numbers. Gen Petraeus had
already set out the tasks that he wanted the UK to fulfil in MND(SE).
440.  In response, Mr McDonald said that the UK was already unable to perform
some of those tasks: the UK had therefore “considered the list as a high opening bid”.
Mr McDonald reported that they had discussed “the bare bones of a compromise”: the
UK would retain 4,500 troops in Basra until March 2008 (the “tactical overwatch” period);
between March and November (“operational overwatch”) the UK would reduce its troops
to 2,000-2,500, focused on training and mentoring but retaining some intervention
capacity. In extremis, they would need to rely on “over-the-horizon US support”.
211  Email government official working closely with the military, 30 September 2007, ‘[NAME OF
OPERATION]: Meeting with [JAM1] on 28 September’.
212  Letter McDonald to Forber, 28 September 2007, ‘Iraq; Meeting with Steve Hadley, 27 September’.
265
Previous page | Contents | Next page