Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
339.  During the two days of testimony, Ambassador Crocker and Gen Petraeus were
questioned on the UK’s approach in Basra. A briefing paper on key points from those
exchanges recorded that:
Asked whether he agreed with the British drawdown and withdrawal from Basra
City, Gen Petraeus said he did.
Asked whether the British had lost Basra, Gen Petraeus said: “The British did
a good hand-off to a force that was trained and equipped and certified to hand
off the palace … There’s no question but that there is a competition down there
between the Fadhila Party, the Supreme Council, the Badr Corps, and certainly
Sadr’s party and militia. Interestingly, there have been deals there recently, and
the violence level has just flat plummeted. It’s included some release of some
Jaysh al-Mahdi figures – again accommodations between all of them. Again for
the Shia south, that’s probably ok.”
Asked why the British had a force protection mission whereas the US had a
population protection mission, Gen Petraeus said that this was due to the lack of
sectarian violence in Basra.
Asked whether he could foresee a situation where US troops may have to be
committed to Basra, Gen Petraeus said: “I don’t think that we need to put US
forces in southern provinces, other than, say, some special forces teams or
occasionally sending something down to help out.”172
340.  A few days after the testimony, Mr Prentice reported that it had “not been the
climactic political event here which many were expecting a few weeks ago” but now
that it was over “the Iraqi political class know better where the US stand and what is
expected of them”.173
341.  Mr Brown spoke to President Bush by video conference on 10 September.174
342.  The briefing provided for the conversation suggested he emphasise that no
decisions had been taken on a radical drawdown of UK troops and that the UK remained
committed both to the coalition and to supporting Iraq’s stability and development.175
343.  Officials assessed that President Bush was unlikely to make any fundamental
changes to US policy in the medium term; rather, his focus would be on short-term
management of the surge. The briefing said:
“Although US commanders in Iraq did sign off on the Palace move [in Basra],
Washington report continued anxiety on the part of US officers and policy-makers
172  Paper [unattributed], [undated], ‘Crocker & Petraeus – Key Quotes & Exchanges’.
173  eGram 37677/07 Baghdad to FCO London, 13 September 2007, ‘Iraq: Future UK Posture;
What is at Stake?’
174  Letter Fletcher to Hickey, 10 September 2007, ‘Prime Minister’s VTC with President Bush,
10 September: Middle East’.
175  Briefing [unattributed], 10 September 2007, ‘Bush VTC’.
248
Previous page | Contents | Next page