Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
official.101 That note said that Maj Gen Binns was still expecting to be able to hand
over responsibility for Basra Palace on 29 August, having written to Gen Petraeus
with his assessment of the PPF’s readiness. Equipment and fuel remained the key
risks to handover.
232.  On 20 August, at the request of the FCO, a Current Intelligence Group (CIG)
examined the influence of the Iraqi Ba’ath Party on the insurgency and Iraqi politics.102
233.  The CIG’s Key Judgements included:
“I. The influence of the Iraqi Ba’ath Party on the Sunni Arab insurgency is marginal.
The party is fractured with little political relevance or popular support in Iraq; this is
highly unlikely to change.
“II. Iraqi Shia politicans’ fears of a Ba’athist resurgence, however exaggerated, are
genuinely held. They will limit the Shia appetite for reconciliation with the Sunni more
broadly.”
234.  The CIG judged that many former leaders of the Iraqi Ba’ath Party had been killed
or captured in 2003; others had fled to neighbouring countries:
“Outlawed by the Coalition Provisional Authority, much of the Ba’ath Party’s senior
Sunni cadre (most of the rank and file were Shia) went underground, while the
party’s system of patronage collapsed.”
235.  In Syria, two former senior Ba’athists (Muhammad Yunis al-Ahmad and
Izzat Ibrahim al-Duri) had established the New Regional Command, loyal to
Saddam Hussein. Saddam Hussein’s execution in December 2006 had exacerbated
rivalry between al-Ahmad and al-Duri, leading to the emergence of two factions
competing for primacy. Those in both factions wanted to see the full restoration of the
party – and themselves – to power in Iraq.
236.  The CIG judged that few Ba’athists still identified with their original Arab socialist
roots. Although most Ba’athists were fundamentally secular and ideologically opposed to
AQ-I, they were willing to co-operate with Sunni Islamists to attack the coalition and what
they saw as a Shia-dominated Iranian-backed Iraqi government.
237.  Although much of the insurgency involved former regime officials and members of
the security forces, the CIG judged that most had abandoned Ba’athism.
238.  Politically, the CIG judged that the Ba’ath Party was “a spent force” which had
little political relevance or popular support in Iraq beyond pockets in former regime
strongholds such as Tikrit: that was “highly unlikely to change”. Nevertheless, many Iraqi
101  Manuscript comment [unattributed] on Minute Cabinet Office [junior official] to Prime Minister,
20 August 2007, ‘Iraq – Transition in Basra’.
102  CIG Assessment, 20 August 2007, ‘Iraq: How Important is the Ba’ath Party?’
226
Previous page | Contents | Next page