Previous page | Contents | Next page
9.6  |  27 June 2007 to April 2008
145.  Pressed by Mr McDonald on the size of the UK’s training contribution, ACM Stirrup
characterised it as “whatever is necessary to carry out whatever tasks are decided”.
But those troops would need to rely on US life support as there would be no UK force
protection.
146.  ACM Stirrup had suggested that Mr Brown should tell President Bush that the UK
was “prepared to provide some hundreds, provided the tasks are there”. Mr McDonald
observed that ACM Stirrup “was clearly reluctant to provide over 500”.
147.  Mr Brown discussed Iraq with President Bush at Camp David on 30 July.66 The
meeting note drafted by Mr Brown’s Private Secretary recorded only that Mr Brown
welcomed the common ground between himself and President Bush on Iraq and had
outlined the UK’s proposals for a “development agency” in Basra.
148.  During the visit, Mr Brown and President Bush also met privately over dinner and
breakfast. Over dinner they “discussed the progress in the provinces overseen by the
UK now moving to overwatch” but the content of the discussion was not recorded.
149.  Mr McDonald provided Mr Brown with a substantial ‘Steering Brief’ on Iraq for the
Camp David meeting.67 In it he wrote that, on the Iraqi political process:
“Bush is habitually optimistic about the prospects. But in reality, the picture is
bleak. The political process is not delivering even gradual progress, as we hoped
it would …”
150.  Mr McDonald wrote that the US surge had delivered mixed results, and that doubts
over ISF capability raised concerns about the sustainability of the gains which had
been made. In Basra, it was important that PIC should happen before November, when
the next roulement of troops would take place, but Gen Petraeus was believed to be
sceptical about the ability of the local ISF to handle the city’s security.
151.  In a press conference after the meeting on 30 July, President Bush told reporters
that:
“There is no doubt in my mind that Gordon Brown understands that failure in Iraq
would be a disaster for the security of our own countries, that failure in Iraq would
embolden extremist movements throughout the Middle East, that failure in Iraq
would basically say to you know people sitting on the fence around the region that al
Qaeda is powerful enough to drive great countries like Great Britain and America out
of Iraq before the mission is done.”68
152.  Mr Brown re-emphasised the UK’s obligations to the Iraqi people and the United
Nations and his hope that the UK would shortly be able to transfer security responsibility
66  Letter Clunes to Gould, 31 July 2007, ‘Prime Minister’s Meeting with President Bush: Iraq […]’.
67  Minute McDonald, [undated], ‘Iraq: Steering Brief’.
68  Camp David Press Conference, 30 July 2007.
211
Previous page | Contents | Next page