Previous page | Contents | Next page
9.6  |  27 June 2007 to April 2008
engage in direct contact with representatives of the coalition was likely to continue “at
least so long as there is no timetable for MNF withdrawal”.
73.  The JIC’s Key Judgements included:
“I. Muqtada al-Sadr’s leadership of his movement will not face serious challenge:
he has no obvious successor. But his followers are likely to remain fractious: deep
seated animosities have been managed rather than resolved. As a political force,
Sadrism will probably not survive Sadr himself: …
“III. Backed by his Jaysh al-Mahdi (JAM) militia, Sadr continues to exercise
considerable political clout in Baghdad and across large parts of the South. His
relations with Prime Minister Maliki have soured. Although withdrawing from
government, Sadr wishes to remain politically engaged … Sadr, like others, is
positioning himself to benefit from any change of Prime Minister.
“IV. Sadr’s relationship with other Shia political figures is equally fraught. Rivalry
is particularly intense with ISCI [Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq], reinforced by
a long standing dynastic feud. But neither side appears willing yet to risk Shia
unity by forming an alternative alliance. ISCI and others in the Shia United Iraqi
Alliance (UIA) are also nervous of Sadr’s ability to mobilise mass support to general
widespread disorder.
“VI. Sadr uses violence as a political tool. He probably also has to accept some
JAM violence to maintain its cohesion and his popular support. However, Sadr will
try to calibrate anti-coalition attacks and prevent any return to large-scale sectarian
conflict. To date he has intervened quickly to prevent intra-Shia violence from
escalating: if he cannot prevent it, he will try to exploit it.”
74.  The JIC judged that al-Sadr’s relationship with Iran was “complex”, he had “spent
much of this year in hiding in Iran”, but he and the Iranians were “likely to remain
uncomfortable partners”.
75.  The JIC assessed that al-Sadr was also motivated by “a genuine desire to see
improvements in the quality of life for his core constituency among Iraq’s Shia poor”.
Popular appeal would make the Sadrists well placed to take seats on local councils in
future provincial elections, in which they would be participating for the first time. The JIC
assessed that JAM would be used to intimidate the Sadrists’ rivals and the electorate.
197
Previous page | Contents | Next page