Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
helping the economic development of the country.35 He attributed the UK’s early failures
in Iraq to insufficient resources being applied to help with economic reconstruction.
69.  In advance of the NSID(OD) meeting planned for 19 July, Mr Bowen advised
Mr Browne that there were indications that No.10 was keen to use it to reach a
decision in principle on the UK’s longer-term engagement in Iraq. An announcement
would then be timed for late September, after the report to Congress by Gen Petraeus
and Ambassador Crocker.36
70.  Mr Bowen reported that it had also been suggested that the withdrawal from
Basra Palace should be delayed to the same timescale, and be wrapped up in a single
announcement. Mr Bowen recognised that this was a “seductive picture” but there were
“substantial risks” that Mr Browne would want to weigh:
“To begin with, there could be real problems in linking the Basra Palace decision to a
much bigger decision on the UK presence as a whole. First … keeping a substantial
presence in the Palace longer than is militarily necessary could, and probably would,
cost lives and injuries. Second, leaving it until after the Crocker/Petraeus report will
not necessarily make it any easier to handle with the US …
“The bigger problem is how we handle the very significant political fall-out that would
follow a decision and announcement of UK terms for MND(SE). There is a serious
risk of major damage to US/UK relations across a range of security issues …
Moreover, we run the risk of undermining our trustworthiness as a close ally with the
permanent organs of the US state and armed forces in a way which would do lasting
damage to our security … interests.
“Ironically enough, it could easily be that by the autumn, the US political picture
could have changed sufficiently to make it less difficult for us to make such
a decision/announcement by doing it in a way which goes with the grain of
US/coalition planning. The problem with reaching a decision next week is that:
a. it is difficult to see how the PM could not tell the President …
b. although we might plan to delay any announcement … there is a strong
chance that the decision in principle could leak.”
71.  At the request of the FCO, on 12 July the JIC assessed the internal dynamics within
the Sadrist movement, Muqtada al-Sadr’s political strategy and his attitude to violence.37
72.  The JIC judged that al-Sadr’s immediate priority was “to secure (and get credit for)
a timetable for the departure of ‘occupation forces’” and that his consistent refusal to
35  BBC Radio 4, 11 July 2007, Today Programme.
36  Minute Bowen to PSSC/Secretary of State [MOD], 11 July 2007, ‘Iraq: Basra Palace and the Longer
Term UK Posture’.
37  JIC Assessment, 12 July 2007, ‘Muqtada al-Sadr: Keeping His Distance’.
196
Previous page | Contents | Next page