Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
590.  Mr Blair’s Private Secretary described the planned Parliamentary statement to
Dr Meghan O’Sullivan, Deputy National Security Advisor for Iraq and Afghanistan, on
15 February.304
591.  The Private Secretary advised Mr Blair the following day that there were “rumblings
of discontent within the US system about the timing of the statement”, which some in the
US Administration would have preferred the UK to put off until April.305
592.  The Private Secretary also told Mr Blair:
“There are signs that US, and Iraqi, attitudes to transition could cause us difficulties.
Neither party shows much enthusiasm for transition in the Spring (or even Summer).
This could well affect our own plans, with the [US] Corps now judging that Maysan
might be ready for transition in May, but that Basra probably won’t be ready in June.
As you heard at DOP, the MOD are very keen that the idea of drawing‑down by a
further battalion at the end of August should be a fixed target. DOP agreed to review
this in the Summer, and it will – as now – be difficult to justify a further draw‑down
(especially out of the city centre) if we retain nominal responsibility for security.”306
593.  Lt Gen Lamb sent a report on his work on reconciliation, which MOD forwarded
to Mr Blair’s Private Secretary on 15 February.307 Knowledge of the negotiations was
limited to a very small number of individuals on both the Iraqi and the MNF‑I sides.
594.  On Sunni engagement, Lt Gen Lamb reported that there had been MNF‑I effort
since summer 2006 to bring Sunni insurgent groups into a dialogue that might lead to
a cease‑fire with the MNF/ISF.
595.  Lt Gen Lamb had established substantive negotiations with leadership elements of
Ansar al‑Sunna, Jaysh al‑Islami and Jaysh al‑Mujahadeen. The groups were negotiating
among internal factions the possibility of forming a single organisation, calling a
cease‑fire and working to defeat AQ‑I. Lt Gen Lamb reported that a confidence‑building
test case was under way within Baghdad and Anbar, in which an economic
reconstruction package was provided in return for “local protection in the area”.
596.  Lt Gen Lamb reported that negotiations with Shia/JAM representatives in Sadr
City were less advanced and were more complicated. JAM was not a homogenous
organisation. The Mayor of Sadr City had begun to engage politically with the MNF
and ISF and the possibility of contact with other Shia/JAM leaders in Baghdad was
being explored.
304  Minute Banner to Sheinwald, 15 February 2007, ‘Iraq/NSC’.
305  Minute Banner to Prime Minister, 16 February 2007, ‘Iraq – Statement to the House’.
306  Minute Banner to Prime Minister, 16 February 2007, ‘Iraq update, 16 February’.
307  Letter McNeil to Banner, 15 February 2007, ‘SBMR‑I Reconciliation and Outreach Update’ enclosing
Note ‘SBMR‑I Reconciliation/Outreach Sitrep’.
110
Previous page | Contents | Next page