Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
violence is directed against the coalition. Once that is excluded, the level of violence
is very low compared with many areas in Iraq …
“While acknowledging serious US concerns we must take the opportunity to build
momentum towards Iraqi control …
“There is no question of us leaving a vacuum in the city, as the IA [Iraqi Army] and
IPS [Iraqi Police Service] are already doing patrols and we will remain present in the
Provincial Joint Co‑ordination Centre and military transition teams …”
473.  On the impact of reducing troop numbers, Mr Browne said:
“The clear military advice … is that re‑posturing and the associated drawdown will
not adversely affect our capacity to provide support to the Iraqi Security Forces,
including underwriting it by providing a battlegroup size reserve force. We must
recognise that after re‑posturing re‑intervention would not be straight‑forward but
this is a nettle that must be grasped at some stage.
“I share your view that … we need to have carefully considered the implications both
for security in Basra … and any knock on effect of the impending Baghdad initiative.
But I can assure you that the military advice, as outlined by CDS, is based on
precisely this kind of careful consideration …”
474.  Mr Browne added:
“So while there are inevitable risks and uncertainties I am confident we are doing our
best to manage them. And we must also acknowledge that there are risks too on the
other side …
“There is also the risk that if we delay too long … we will inadvertently be sending a
wrong and damaging signal on Basra in particular – suggesting that Op SINBAD has
not worked, or that we are not making progress against our plans, when in fact we
are. Moreover there is a risk that we will appear indecisive at the very time that we
are starting to face questions about announcements on troop levels and equipment
in Afghanistan.
“These factors explain why I strongly believe we should make our final decisions and
announce them, as soon as possible …”
475.  On 24 January, Maj Gen Shaw reported:
“On the re‑posturing plans, whilst Corps is supportive, Casey has tasked Corps to
conduct a security review of Basra with the aim of retaining a military operating base
in Basra after the US and UK civil delegations have left. I mention this to illustrate
the extent to which Casey is not comfortable with our re‑posturing plans …
“Pressure for anti‑Iranian activity would seem to be mounting. I am steering activity
towards countering the malign Iranian influence (IEDs, weapons etc) but keeping
88
Previous page | Contents | Next page