Previous page | Contents | Next page
9.5  |  June 2006 to 27 June 2007
445.  Major General Jonathan Shaw, who became GOC MND(SE) in mid-January 2007,
told the Inquiry that he “wasn’t there” when negotiations with JAM1 first began and that
“they were started by [officials working closely with the military]”, adding:
“… I can tell you from my perspective where it began. It began right back in January
when I arrived, the germ of the idea had probably been in my head before I got
there.”240
446.  Maj Gen Shaw told the Inquiry that he had quickly concluded that “trying to
annihilate JAM in a kinetic attritional confrontation was a bit futile” and that the way to
deal with them was to “kill the irreconcilable and … take the reconcilable on board”.241
As a consequence “in January the idea started coming to me that we had to start looking
for someone to talk to”.
447.  Maj Gen Shaw “re‑targeted” assets, by telling them “I want you to look for people
to talk to in JAM”.242
448.  On 19 January, Maj Gen Shirreff completed his post‑tour report.243 In it he argued:
“… I am not convinced that we have correctly identified the strategic Main Effort and
resourced it appropriately to avoid potentially disastrous failure in Iraq.
“We have no choice but to achieve mission success in Iraq. This means
concentrating resources in pursuit of national interests: clouting, not dribbling.
As we hand over, it is encouraging to see that the importance of committing UKSF
[Special Forces] to support our efforts in SE Iraq has been recognised. However,
we have left it very late and depended on a willing and generous ally to make good
other shortfalls. I suspect that if we had concentrated strategic assets from the start
of TELIC, the margin between success and failure would not be so narrow as it
appears now.
“The same point applies to the Comprehensive Approach. We have preached its
virtues in theory without giving genuine substance to it on the ground … Compare
the generosity, agility and flexibility of US CERP [Commanders Emergency
Response Program] funding with the parsimony of Whitehall and the lack of any
unity of command or purpose.”
449.  Maj Gen Shirreff concluded his report:
“We can achieve mission success here [in MND(SE)] however complex and
intractable the problems facing us. The key is to understand the narrowness of the
margin between success and failure and to take nothing for granted.”
240  Public hearing, 11 January 2010, page 19.
241  Public hearing, 11 January 2010, pages 19‑20.
242  Public hearing, 11 January 2010, page 21. Based on redacted material.
243  Report Shirreff, 19 January 2007, ‘Post Operational Report – Operation TELIC, Part One: General
Officer Commanding’s Overview’.
83
Previous page | Contents | Next page