Previous page | Contents | Next page
9.5  |  June 2006 to 27 June 2007
capability.92 It endorsed the Committee’s opinion that the Iraqi Government in Baghdad
should maintain its interest in Basra and the wider region.
On border security the Government response advised that the Government of Iraq had
recently pressed the Iranian Government to cut any links with armed groups operating in
Iraq and to do more to improve border security and fight terrorism. UK forces were training
the Iraqi Department of Border Enforcement in Maysan province, which was providing a
visible presence on known smuggling routes. The UK was encouraging Iraqi responsibility
for maritime security, including deterrence and disruption of piracy, smuggling and terrorist
activity. Iraqi forces were supported in this role by a significant coalition presence, and
were increasingly operating in collaboration with their Kuwaiti partners.
128.  On 23 August, Maj Gen Shirreff reported that:
“… the redeployment of the Maysan Battlegroup is now complete and CAN [Camp
Abu Naji], the focus of so much fighting over the last three years, is now closed and
handed over to the IA [Iraqi Army]. This has been a demanding and well‑executed
operation and considerable credit is due to those involved. The final convoy returns
to SLB [Shaiba Logistics Base] on the evening of 24 August.”93
129.  Maj Gen Shirreff reported that he had briefed Maj Gen Hamadi on Op
SALAMANCA, emphasising that “we are implementing the Basra Security plan as
agreed by Prime Minister Maliki rather than anything new or different”. Maj Gen Hamadi
had “bought in” to the plan.
130.  Lt Gen Shirreff told the Inquiry that he also had to get the approval of the Iraqi
authorities in Baghdad, which he described as “a very lengthy, rather tortuous process”.94
Once this approval was obtained, Gen Casey offered the UK a battalion from his Corps
operational reserve.95
131.  Lt Gen Shirreff told the Inquiry that “the idea of American troops on the streets of
Basra did not go down particularly well in London”, and no US troops were involved. The
US did, however, provide some surveillance assets, and significant amounts of funding –
by the end of the operation US$80m had been spent.
92  Twelfth Special Report from the House of Commons Defence Committee, Session 2005‑2006,
UK Operations in Iraq: Government Response to the Committee’s Thirteenth Report of Session 2005‑06,
HC 1603.
93  Minute Shirreff, 23 August 2006, ‘GOC MND(SE) – Southern Iraq Update – 23 August 2006’.
94  Public hearing, 11 January 2010, page 17.
95  Public hearing, 11 January 2010, page 16.
27
Previous page | Contents | Next page