Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
arms. In many cases distinctions between Sunni Arab nationalists and jihadists are
now blurred.”
88.  The JIC assessed that AQ‑I remained the largest single insurgent network. But the
impact of Abu Musab al‑Zarqawi’s death had been short‑lived. His successor, Abu Ayyub
al‑Masri, was expected to continue al‑Zarqawi’s strategy and tactics:
“… including his campaign of attacks on the Shia to foment a civil war which is
starting to get results.”
89.  Mr Browne described the Shia violence in southern Iraq to the Inquiry as
“a competition for influence and resources” that the UK was clear would need to
be resolved by a combination of Iraqi politics and the Iraqi security forces.64
90.  Mr Browne told the Inquiry that he had invested considerable time drawing the
attention of the Iraqi Government to the need to address the problems in the South.
Prime Minister Maliki had given an undertaking that he would deal with the situation
and deploy the necessary resources but “his machinery of government was not always
capable of delivering that, and he had the additional problem … that the Provincial
Council in Basra, at the time … did not function properly on occasions”.
91.  On 20 July, Mr Patey sent a valedictory telegram.65 It opened with the summary
“Strategic failure in Iraq a distinct possibility but not inevitable.”
92.  Mr Patey continued:
“The prospect of a low intensity civil war and de facto division of Iraq is probably
more likely at this stage than a successful and sustained transition to a stable
democracy …
“Since the transfer of sovereignty in 2004 we have made considerable progress
in developing the political process … But the process itself has also exposed the
sectarian divisions in the country …
“The current levels of violence are as high as they have ever been and the
increasingly bold and sectarian nature of the violence is the most troubling aspect.
There is little doubt (and this analysis is shared by most Iraqis) that the precipitate
departure of coalition forces from Iraq would lead to open civil war …”
93.  Looking ahead, Mr Patey wrote:
“But the position is not hopeless … Our strategy must be to get the Iraqis to
increasingly take the lead and responsibility. This will produce some uncomfortable
moments but in the long run is the only solution … It should be possible to ensure
64  Public hearing, 25 January 2010, pages 11, 13 and 16.
65  eGram 31514/06 Baghdad to FCO London, 20 July 2006, ‘Iraq: Valedictory’.
18
Previous page | Contents | Next page