Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
“III. Across the South, there is no strong administrative machinery to promote
security and stability …
“IV. The Iraqi security forces can cope with the low level of threat posed by the Sunni
Arab nationalist insurgents and jihadists. Their readiness to deal with the activities
of Shia extremists or intra-Shia violence is more uncertain. Army command, control
and logistics capabilities are all still developing, making major operations without
MNF support difficult. The police are a greater concern: they have multiple loyalties
and have taken sides in intra-Shia clashes. A minority of police, particularly in Basra,
is involved in attacks on the MNF, the assassination of Sunnis and organised crime.”
610.  The JIC considered the background, motives and objectives of Muqtada al-Sadr
on 16 March.296
611.  The JIC judged that al-Sadr had emerged from the December election with
“great political clout” because Prime Minister Ja’afari depended on him to secure
his nomination.
612.  In terms of motivation, the JIC assessed:
“Sadr’s overriding priority is to increase his own power. He probably wants to
be a leading Shia religious authority, above party politics but able to influence
key government policies. He has a genuine desire to see (and get credit for)
improvements in the quality of life for his core constituency; his declared goals also
include: maintaining the unity of Iraq and delaying federalism; ensuring the centrality
of religion in politics; and securing a timetable for the departure of ‘occupation forces’.”
613.  The majority of JAM members were, in the JIC’s judgement, loyal to al-Sadr’s
directives, but a minority were under no effective control and continued to attack
the MNF.
614.  The JIC assessed that al-Sadr had consistently refused direct contact with
representatives of the coalition and judged that this reluctance was “unlikely to change
in the foreseeable future”.
615.  In his weekly report on 19 March, Lt Gen Fry reported that the MNF-I command
group had “wargamed” the implications of a “genuine civil war” in Iraq.297
616.  The command group had concluded that civil war was not inevitable; a properly
constituted government of national unity could still defuse sectarian tension. But the
longer Iraq continued without such a government, the more likely civil war became.
Empirical evidence of civil war was growing but not yet conclusive. The level of violence
296  JIC Assessment, 16 March 2006, ‘Muqtada al-Sadr’.
297  Minute Fry to CDS, 19 March 2006, ‘SBMR-I Weekly Report (203) 19 March 06’ attaching Paper
“Civil War”.
590
Previous page | Contents | Next page