Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
work with NOC management to ensure continued physical operation of
non‑damaged facilities and continued exports …;
work with NOC management to ensure administrative integrity, including staff
retention and payment of salaries;
initial quick assessment of oil sector spending needs …”
142.  The specific operational objectives for oil in the first 60 days were to:
prepare an emergency budget for the oil sector;
arrange for “urgent work” on oil infrastructure; and
assess recent oil exports outside the OFF programme.
143.  The same version of the paper was sent to Mr Blair on 7 March.
144.  A Treasury official invited Mr Brown’s comments on officials’ “first thoughts”
on Treasury policies in a post-Saddam Iraq on 11 February (see Section 13.1).76
The Treasury assessed that the cost of ensuring Iraq’s prosperity and stability was
difficult to predict but “potentially massive”. Iraq was potentially a rich country and the
“obvious answer” was that Iraq should pay “the lion’s share” of its reconstruction from
its oil revenues. However, there were several reasons why that might not cover all –
or even the majority – of the cost of reconstruction:
Iraq’s oil infrastructure could be damaged in any conflict, or sabotaged.
The price of oil could fall.
There would be pressure for Coalition countries to pay for reconstruction.
The OFF programme provided up to US$10bn a year for Iraq. That was enough
to keep Iraq “ticking over”, but it was not clear whether it was enough to pay for
reconstruction.
A post-conflict Iraq might have to pay war reparations and service the country’s
huge debt.
145.  The official proposed that an “emerging policy position” would include maximising
the Iraqi contribution to the cost of reconstruction, initially by maintaining the OFF
programme.
146.  The Treasury told the Inquiry that Mr Brown did not comment.77
147.  Mr John Grainger, an FCO Legal Counsellor, sent the Iraq Planning Unit (IPU)
an outline of the legal position on occupying forces’ rights to deal with oil reserves
76 Minute Treasury [junior official] to Chancellor, 11 February 2003, ‘HMT Policy on Post-Saddam Iraq’
attaching Paper Treasury, 11 February 2003, ‘Post-War Iraq: International Financing Policy’.
77 Email Treasury [junior official] to Iraq Inquiry [junior official], 26 February 2010, [untitled].
396
Previous page | Contents | Next page