Previous page | Contents | Next page
10.3  |  Reconstruction: oil, commercial interests, debt relief, asylum and stabilisation policy
123.  At the meeting with President Bush, Mr Blair suggested that a UN badge was
needed for what the US and UK wanted to do, and would help with the humanitarian
problems.65
124.  The record of the meeting between President Bush and Mr Blair does not show
any discussion of oil issues.
125.  The first meeting of the US/UK/Australia Working Group on Day After Economic
Issues took place in Washington on 5 February.66
126.  The British Embassy Washington reported that the DoD had detailed contingency
plans to protect and restore the oil sector. The DoD was well aware of the importance
of the oil sector for reconstruction. In the best case (minimal damage, current levels of
outputs restored after two to three months), the DoD estimated that the sector could
make a net contribution of US$12bn in the first year after any conflict; in the worst case
it could impose a net cost of US$8bn.
127.  The Working Group agreed to co-operate on defining practical economic steps to
be taken in the first three to six months of military occupation.
128.  The FCO member of the UK delegation, the Economic Adviser for the Middle East
and North Africa, reported separately to Mr Drummond that:
“DoD are ploughing ahead with detailed contingency planning for the oil sector
in the initial military administration phase. But … there was a conspicuous
disconnect between this and civilian planning for economic management and policy
development within Iraq …”67
129.  Mr Marc Grossman, US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, and
Mr Douglas Feith, US Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, gave evidence on US
post‑conflict plans to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on 11 February.68
130.  The British Embassy Washington reported that Mr Grossman’s and Mr Feith’s
message to the Foreign Relations Committee was “liberation not occupation”, with
an assurance that the US did not want to control Iraq’s economic resources.
65 Letter Manning to McDonald, 31 January 2003, ‘Iraq: Prime Minister’s Conversation with President Bush
on 31 January’.
66 Telegram 169 Washington to FCO London, 6 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Meeting of Trilateral Working Group
on ‘Day After’ Economic Issues: Short Term Reconstruction’.
67 Teleletter FCO [junior official] to Drummond, 6 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Meeting of US/UK/Australian
Working Group on ‘Day After’ Economic Issues: Assessment and Follow Up’.
68 Telegram 196, Washington to FCO, 12 February 2003, ‘Iraq ‘Day After’: US Makes Initial Planning
Public’.
393
Previous page | Contents | Next page