Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
“The legacy will be imperfect, but we should not be too defensive. The challenge
was great, and the achievements are considerable. If we can contain the
politicisation of the IPS from getting out of control, get the multilateral agencies more
engaged, and plan now on some longer-term priorities, we can leave knowing that
southern Iraq has the capability of realising its massive economic potential for the
whole country. We should be able to leave with the goodwill of the majority of the
population in southern Iraq (there would come a point when that is less certain).
But we need to prepare the ground now to lower UK public and international
expectations of what we are leaving behind.”
151.  The Constitutional Commission presented the text of the draft Constitution to
the TNA on 28 August.73
152.  Mr Patey described the document that had been produced as “an admirable
document which contains much we should applaud”.74 Its “key achievements” were
“protection of fundamental rights including minorities and women” and it came closer to
meeting Sunni concerns than the draft as it stood on 15 August.
153.  The immediate Sunni reaction to the text was reported by Mr Patey to be “muted
… with many still considering their position”.75 But a “key positive” was that “almost all
are encouraging participation in the referendum thus acknowledging that influence is
won more effectively by voting than by violence”.
154.  In the period after the Constitutional Commission announced that it had reached
agreement on the draft text, the US encouraged further discussion between parties
aimed at increasing Sunni Arab support for the Constitution.76
155.  Sir Nigel Sheinwald told the Inquiry that Mr Blair’s aspirations for the Iraqi
Constitution were:
“… that it should get agreed and the referendum should go ahead and it should have
a very broad base of support in the population; that we should keep to the timetable,
we should keep the show going, we shouldn’t get derailed by the violence which of
course continued, intensified …”77
156.  Mr Asquith told the Inquiry that the UK’s objectives for the Constitution were:
“To lay the basis for a representative democracy which kept the country together;
which didn’t build in sectarian advantages or ethnic advantages; and which didn’t
create a form of federalism which was going to increase the risk of the country
73 Allawi AA. The Occupation of Iraq: winning the war, losing the peace. Yale University Press, 2007.
74  eGram 12004/05 Baghdad to FCO London, 28 August 2005, ‘Iraq: Constitution; Worth Waiting For’.
75  eGram 12058/05 Baghdad to FCO London, 30 August 2005, ‘Iraq: Constitution: Further Reaction from
Sunni Arabs and Others’.
76  Deeks AS & Burton MD. Iraq’s Constitution: A Drafting History. Cornell International Law Journal,
Volume 40 (2007).
77  Private hearing, 3 September 2010, page 73.
514
Previous page | Contents | Next page