Previous page | Contents | Next page
9.4  |  June 2005 to May 2006
within the week.16 The UNOCS was pressing ahead with its programme of assistance
and:
“We have agreed to identify Civil Service experts who might contribute to UN
seminars. The UNOCS have asked if we can suggest an authority on military-civilian
relations, and have intimated that further support from us in facilitating the access of
experts would be most welcome.”
44.  Air Chief Marshal Glenn Torpy, Chief of Joint Operations, submitted a paper entitled
‘Operational Transition in Iraq’ to the Chiefs of Staff on 22 June setting out a possible
timeline for withdrawal of UK forces.17 In the paper he proposed a four-phase transition:
“Security Assistance”, meaning active involvement in SSR;
“Transfer to Provincial Iraqi Control with Tactical Overwatch”, meaning the Iraqi
Security Forces (ISF) would take the lead on security with the UK in support;
“Operational Overwatch” meaning operating from a reduced number of MNF
bases in order to reduce profile, while providing reinforcement to Iraqi forces;
and
“Strategic Overwatch”, described as “The Coalition posture that will underwrite
Iraqi self-reliance and the normalisation of bilateral relationships.”
45.  The second phase would be reached in Muthanna and Maysan in autumn 2005, and
in Dhi Qar and Basra the following spring.
46.  ACM Torpy stated: “The key condition that guides this time-based approach is the
relative capacity of Iraqi provinces to assume full responsibility for their security.” He
went on to explain that:
“Operational Transition depends on growing Iraqi capacity, which must remain the
dynamic, coherent and properly-funded Main Effort.”
47.  On 22 June, the British Embassy Baghdad reported that General George Casey,
Commander of the MNF-I, had returned to the US in order to present his MNF-I Force
Structure Review.18 That review did not envisage any fundamental changes in the
Campaign Plan, and:
“The US, at the local military level, accept and understand UK plans in relation to
MND(SE) including the point that any future changes in the level of UK forces in the
south east would not (not) release troops for redeployment to other areas of Iraq.”
16  eGram 7276/05 Baghdad to FCO London, 22 June 2005, ‘Iraq: Constitution: Two Months and Counting’.
17  Minute CJO to COSSEC, 22 June 2005, ‘Op Telic: Operational Transition in Iraq’.
18  eGram 7335/05 Baghdad to FCO London, 22 June 2005, ‘Iraq: MNF-I Campaign Assessment: Emerging
[illegible]’.
495
Previous page | Contents | Next page