Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
544.  Lt Gen Kiszely reflected that:
“As a nation which contributes only about 5 percent of the forces and 1 percent
of the money, UK continues to exert influence on campaign direction and conduct
disproportionate to its contribution …”
545.  Of the 27 nations with the coalition, only the UK sought to exert influence over the
US by committing significant numbers of officers to MNF-I and MNC-I headquarters.
Lt Gen Kiszely considered that the ability to do so “results largely from identifying key
posts and filling them with the right officers”. He suggested that the influence and
effectiveness of some officers would be enhanced by increased tour lengths:
“With the US military on 12-month tours, the 6-month UK tours create turbulence
and attract criticism. This is particularly the case for appointments involved in
developing relationships with host-nation officers and officials. We should identify
posts requiring longer tour-lengths, increase them to 9-12 month tours, and provide
appropriate support packages.”
546.  On 19 April, a CIG assessed the threat posed by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi’s
organisation to British interests in Iraq, prompted by a statement claiming to be from
AQ-I which had appeared on several websites, some of which had previously been used
by al-Zarqawi for similar purposes.302
547.  The statement threatened intensive military attacks against UK forces and
their allies in the south of Iraq, and also attacks against Iraqi “agents and spies” and
“collaborators” working with the UK.
548.  Although the authenticity of the statement could not be verified, the JIC judged
that “it must be taken seriously”. The JIC assessed that the threat posed in Iraq was
“diverse”, as al-Zarqawi had in the past been responsible for suicide bombings, complex
attacks and kidnappings.
549.  The JIC judged that non-military UK interests in Iraq, although not specifically
mentioned in the statement, could be under threat as well as military and civilian targets
in the South. Attacks on UK interests outside Iraq could not be ruled out.
550.  On 19 April, the Iraq Senior Officials Group was briefed that delays in forming the
ITG were having an impact on the constitutional process, “putting its already ambitious
timetable under even greater pressure”.303
551.  Further delay was possible because of the TAL’s “lack of resonance as an Iraqi
document”. Delays to the parliamentary elections scheduled for December would mean
additional costs for the MNF-I in maintaining security.
302  JIC Assessment, 19 April 2005, ‘Al-Zarqawi Threatens UK forces in Iraq’.
303  Letter Fergusson to Asquith, 19 April 2005, ‘Iraq: Senior Officials Group’.
482
Previous page | Contents | Next page