Previous page | Contents | Next page
9.3  |  July 2004 to May 2005
243.  Gen Walker chaired an internal MOD meeting on 19 October to discuss
Lt Gen Fry’s paper.123 He underlined the need to consider the request in terms of
military advantage and to have a good understanding of the likelihood of success in
Fallujah within the 30 day time period.
244.  Air Chief Marshal Sir Jock Stirrup, Chief of the Air Staff, noted that “the key
question in relation to military benefit was whether the UK contribution in North Babil
would increase the chance of success in Fallujah. If this was the case, then a clear logic
chain existed in support of the UK deployment.” Both Lt Gen McColl and Maj Gen Rollo
saw military benefit in the deployment.
245.  Sir Kevin Tebbit, MOD Permanent Under Secretary, considered that the Black
Watch could help prevent insurgents spreading out from Fallujah but “there would be
a casualty issue”.
246.  At the end of the meeting, Gen Walker commissioned the DIS to prepare
a one‑page threat assessment for North Babil compared with MND(SE), including
a casualty assessment.
247.  Mr Blair’s Private Secretary provided him with a Cabinet Office brief on the pros
and cons for the different timing options of a decision.124 It highlighted that an early
decision would mean that UK troops (the Black Watch) could be in place in good time,
but that it would mean extending their tour of duty. A delayed decision would mean
that the next troop rotation would have arrived (the Scots Guards) and could backfill
the Black Watch as the MND(SE) armoured reserve. But delay might also lead the US
to conclude that the UK would always turn down such deployment requests.
248.  In his covering note, Mr Blair’s Private Secretary told Mr Blair that he would get
“firm advice” later in the week, but that Gen Walker and Mr Hoon would discuss options
with him the next day. Gen Walker was reported to favour limiting any offer of support to
30 days, to discourage early deployment.
249.  Anticipating a positive decision on the North Babil deployment, Mr Ian Lee, MOD
Director General Media and Communications, wrote to Mr Martin Howard, MOD Director
General Operational Policy, with some thoughts about announcing it. Mr Lee observed
that “journalists find it hard to believe that the US military machine needs this UK help,
and this in turn leads them to the conclusion that (US) politics is driving the issue”.125
250.  The Defence Intelligence Staff (DIS) reported on 20 October that there had been
no MNF-I fatalities in the previous month within the area the US was proposing UK
forces should deploy to, but that they could “expect a hostile local population”, and might
123  Minutes, 19 October 2004, ‘Record of Discussion – CDS O’ Group – 19 Oct 04’.
124  Minute Quarrey to Blair, 19 October 2004, ‘Iraq: Possible Troop Redeployment’ attaching ‘Iraq: UK
Deployment to North Babil’.
125  Minute Lee to DG Op Pol, 19 October 2004, ‘Troop Movements in Iraq’.
435
Previous page | Contents | Next page