Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
outside its current area of operations”.120 He confirmed that a request for UK ground
forces to be made available to relieve US forces was under consideration and that a
recommendation from Gen Walker was expected by the middle of the week.
238.  Mr Hoon said:
“This request, if agreed, would involve UK land forces operating outside MND(SE).
It is worth bearing in mind that Royal Air Force personnel have been operating
over the whole of Iraq when required to support the coalition, and that some British
personnel are based in Baghdad to support coalition operations. Other British land
forces have previously operated outside MND(SE).”
239.  Denying speculation that the request was “somehow political” and linked to the
US Presidential Elections, Mr Hoon stressed that it had been “a military request …
linked to … efforts to create the best possible situation in which to hold the Iraqi
elections in January”.
240.  In a press conference the following day, Mr Straw was asked whether the
deployment was a “done deal” and replied that the UK was “very sympathetic” to the
US request, but “no final decision has been taken”.121
241.  Mr Straw told journalists:
“I understand the concerns that have been expressed. I think the concern is as to
whether or not there is so-called mission creep, whether we will be there longer
than anticipated.
“We are not proposing to increase the total number of troops that would be in Iraq,
nor would we be extending the normal tour of duty of this particular unit [the Black
Watch].
“The purpose of these military movements is to stabilise the security situation
as quickly as possible so that we create a more satisfactory security environment
more quickly so that, in turn, the elections can take place by the end of January so
that in turn the Iraqis can start more quickly to take more and effective control of
their country.”
242.  On 19 October, Lt Gen Fry provided a paper for the Chiefs of Staff outlining the
background to the request and the necessary timeline for any decision on deployment.122
He did not make any recommendation as to whether or not the UK should agree to the
US request.
120  House of Commons, Official Report, 18 October 2004, columns 625-626.
121  ITN, 19 October 2004, UK: Annan, Straw Speak to Press After Talks on Darfur and Iraq.
122  Minute DCDS(C) to COS (via COSSEC), 19 October 2004, ‘Iraq – Potential UK Battlegroup
Deployment to North Babil’.
434
Previous page | Contents | Next page