9.2 | 23
May 2003 to June 2004
Provisional
Authority and the United Nations would work to reach agreement on
a
transition
mechanism that would have the broad-based support of the Iraqi
people.”
771.
The same
telegram recorded the UK report to the Security Council on progress
in
the
provision of basic services, economic and reconstruction issues as
well as judicial
reform and
human rights. Summarising other Security Council members’
reactions,
UKMIS New
York said that:
“Council
members generally support the Brahimi report. Many raise questions
about
the
Transitional Administrative Law (TAL), the consultation with wider
Iraqis and
the scope
for UN involvement. Russia, Germany and France express openness
to
consider a
Council decision to support the UN’s future role in Iraq but do not
press.
Russia
again raises the possibility of an international
conference.”
772.
Responding to
points about the Security Agreement, Sir Emyr Jones Parry
said
“for now
resolution 1511 gave all the clarity we needed on
security”.
773.
Sir Jeremy
Greenstock called on Mr Blair on the same day as the US/UK
briefing
to the
Security Council.426
Sir Jeremy
highlighted the tension between providing
continuity
through the transition to Iraqi sovereignty and the need for a
clear end to
Occupation.
He felt that the US “realised that a new UNSCR would be needed” to
deal
with
post-transition structures.
774.
Mr Llewellyn
wrote to the IPU on 25 February.427
In his letter
he expressed
concern that
the CPA was not consulting the UN Special Representative to
the
Secretary-General
on draft legislation covering economic reform and
governance,
as was
clearly required by resolution 1483.
775.
Consultation
had taken place until the death of Mr Vieira de Mello
on
19 August 2003.
But when FCO Legal Advisers subsequently tried to establish
with
the CPA
what form of consultation was taking place, their response made
clear that
consultation
had probably ceased since the departure of the UN in the aftermath
of the
August
bombing.
776.
Contact
between lawyers to point to the legal requirement and so
encourage
consultation
had got nowhere. In Mr Llewellyn’s view, the extensive body of
CPA
legislation
dealing with economic reform and governance matters since August
2003
was
therefore of questionable lawfulness. The risk of claims against
the UK could not
be ruled
out.
777.
Mr Llewellyn
therefore recommended that the matter should be taken up at a
more
senior
level, or that the UK should simply conduct the UN consultation
itself by sending
drafts to
the office of Mr Mountain in New York.
426
Letter
Cannon to Owen, 24 February 2004, ‘Iraq: Sir Jeremy Greenstock’s
call on the Prime Minister,
24
February’.
427
Minute
Llewellyn to Crompton, 25 February 2004, ‘Iraq: CPA Legislation:
Need for UN Coordination’.
333