Previous page | Contents | Next page
9.2  |  23 May 2003 to June 2004
717.  This language was “incendiary”, and the US National Security Council was
reported to have instructed Ambassador Bremer to remove all references to security
from the draft.
718.  Mr Straw’s Private Secretary reported to Mr Blair’s Private Office that progress on
the TAL was “steady”.392
719.  Briefing prepared for Mr Blair in advance of a conversation with President Bush
outlined the difficult issues for the TAL, which included national security and federalism.
720.  The FCO was concerned that the TAL had become too detailed, and was no
longer the simple framework document on structures and principles originally envisaged,
making it difficult to explain to the public and potentially raising objections from
Grand Ayatollah al-Sistani and others.
721.  In a video conference on 4 February, Mr Blair suggested to President Bush that
engagement in Iraq was an opportunity for the UN to re-establish its credibility; it could
also provide an “insurance policy” for the Coalition on the Iraqi political process.393
722.  In early February, the Chiefs of Staff considered whether or not the UK should
deploy the HQ ARRC to Afghanistan and concluded that the UK should consider doing
so in early 2005.394
723.  On 9 February, Mr Llewellyn received a letter from Ms Adams.395 It recorded advice
given by Professor Christopher Greenwood QC, with which the Attorney General agreed,
in response to questions from Mr Llewellyn. Those questions were about the status
of the CPA plus the UK’s obligations as Occupying Power and under the European
Convention of Human Rights.
724.  Mr Llewellyn described the main conclusion of Ms Adams’ letter as:
It was likely that the CPA would be found to be a body constituted by the US
and UK, for which the two States had joint responsibility under international
law. It was likely that this would mean that the UK could be held responsible
for legislation adopted by the CPA which infringed Occupation law. The fact
that UK officials may have attempted to get the legislation amended would
not be relevant because “Bremer acts on behalf of the UK in authorising
CPA legislation.”
392  Letter Owen to Cannon, 3 February 2004, ‘Iraq: Prime Minister’s VTC with President Bush: Wednesday
4 February’ attaching Briefing ‘Iraq: Prime Minister’s VTC with President Bush: Wednesday 4 February’.
393  Letter Cannon to Adams, 4 February 2004, ‘Prime Minister’s video-conference with President Bush,
4 February’.
394  Note Secretary of State [FCO], 6 February 2004, ‘Afghanistan’.
395  Letter Llewelyn to Crompton, 25 February 2004, ‘Iraq: Attorney General’s Advice: The Extent of the
UK’s International Obligations in Iraq’.
325
Previous page | Contents | Next page