Previous page | Contents | Next page
9.1  |  March to 22 May 2003
to attempt to run HQs in Iraq at Corps, Divisional and Brigade levels simultaneously
would be, to say the least, a very ambitious undertaking. It is unlikely (at best) in
these circumstances that we could command at Divisional level more than one
brigade in addition to our own, and this would limit the number of provinces we could
supervise. Even then, recuperating from such an effort would be a major challenge,
and it would be years before the Armed Forces recovered the ‘steady state’
capability which our planning assumptions say they should provide. Finally, we could
not enter into such a commitment without having absolute certainty about who would
replace us and when.”117
The Allied Rapid Reaction Corps (ARRC)
The ARRC is a ready-formed and trained HQ, commanded by a three-star officer, which
can deploy within five to 30 days.118 It was created in 1992 in Germany as an operational
HQ. It does not have fighting capability, but its approximately 1,000 staff are able to
command up to four multi-national divisions (around 100,000 personnel). The ARRC is
able to deploy the communications systems necessary for a command role of this size,
and the support services needed to take care of its own personnel.
The UK is the ‘framework’ or lead nation for the ARRC and provides around 60 percent of
its staff; other members of NATO provide the remaining 40 percent. To deploy the ARRC
without NATO staff, the UK would need to backfill those posts.
The ARRC is deployable once every two to three years. Its first deployment was to Bosnia
in December 1995.
223.  Major General Adrian Bradshaw, who succeeded Major General Graham Binns as
Commander of 7 Armoured Brigade, told the Inquiry “things were relatively calm” when
he first arrived in Iraq in April 2003 but “it was clear that we had an urgent task to rebuild
security structures”.119
224.  At the request of the FCO, the Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC) provided an
Assessment titled ‘The Initial Landscape Post-Saddam’ on 16 April.120 In it the JIC
judged that:
“The situation in Iraq is complex, fast-moving and confused. In the very near term,
remnants of the regime will continue to present a limited threat to the
re-establishment of peace and stability in Iraq. But other threats to either Coalition
forces or the longer term post-Saddam political process are emerging.”
117  Letter Watkins to Manning, 17 April 2003, ‘Iraq: Possible Role for the ARRC’.
118  www.arrc.nato.int
119  Private hearing, 2 June 2010, pages 5-8.
120  JIC Assessment, 16 April 2003, ‘Iraq: the Initial Landscape Post-Saddam’.
167
Previous page | Contents | Next page