Previous page | Contents | Next page
9.1  |  March to 22 May 2003
174.  A note of the discussion recorded that, on the Franks Proclamation, the US felt
“a lot of our [UK] concerns have been addressed”. A new version of the Proclamation
used “verbs that make clear to the people of Iraqi [sic] – what is legally binding and
what is not”.
175.  Ms Rose wrote to Mr Llewellyn on 11 April to “be sure that we are all clear as to
the process of making comments [on ORHA proclamations and instructions] and the
principles which should underlie the changes we propose to the US”.86 Those principles
included that the document:
should not suggest it had legislative authority unless creating “Occupation type
offences” as allowed by the Geneva Convention;
should refer to “dissolving” not “disestablishing” the Ba’ath Party;
should not refer to the CPA exercising legislative, judicial and executive authority
or the powers of government;
should not deny that the Coalition forces are Occupiers; and
should not cut across the Joint Commission concept.
176.  The process for providing UK input described by Ms Rose was that Permanent
Joint Headquarters (PJHQ) lawyers would respond in rapid time to documents sent
from UK officials in theatre, but that this was “not intended to be the last word on the
UK’s response to the documents” and should not constrain the IPU from offering its
own substantive comments.
177.  When the Ad Hoc Meeting on Iraq convened on 12 April, Ms Short informed
attendees that “the legal issues were being managed such that British inhibitions would
be respected”.87
178.  General Sir Mike Jackson, Chief of the General Staff, told the meeting that
“lawlessness was the main problem” but:
“The situation in Basra was being brought under control and the British division
intended to start joint military/[Iraqi] civil police patrols within 48 hours.”
179.  Mr Blair spoke by telephone to President Jacques Chirac on 12 April.88 In her
note of the call, Ms Liz Lloyd, Adviser to Mr Blair on Foreign Policy, recorded President
Chirac’s view that establishing the IIA could only be the UN’s responsibility. He had also
shared indications from some key international institutions that a “UN decision” was
necessary for them to contribute.
180.  Both President Chirac and President Bashar al-Assad of Syria raised the looting
of culturally significant sites, including museums and archaeological remains, in
86  Letter Rose to Llewellyn, 11 April 2003, ‘Iraq: ORHA Proclamations and Instructions’.
87  Minutes, 12 April 2003, Ad Hoc Meeting on Iraq.
88  Letter Lloyd to Owen, 12 April 2003, ‘Iraq: Prime Minister’s conversation with President Chirac’.
159
Previous page | Contents | Next page