Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
631.  Lt Gen Reith sent a first version of the SOR for a UK AOR to the Chiefs of Staff
on 15 April.365 He explained that:
the Chiefs of Staff had already been asked to agree that “the initial UK AOR”
should be “based on” Basra and Maysan provinces;
with the deployment of a divisional headquarters and the “probability of
additional Coalition troops”, the UK had the potential to expand the AOR to
include two other provinces;
the additional provinces would probably be Dhi Qar and Wasit, but that had
not been agreed formally with Lt Gen McKiernan;
the UK “should not plan on substantial early Coalition augmentation”;
the US had accepted that it should “hold the risk” in areas of potential UK
responsibility while waiting for the Coalition force to grow, but there was no
formal agreement with the US on the issue; and
initial discussions had begun with some countries, but all “desire to know where
they will be asked to operate and the forces required”.
632.  Lt Gen Reith advised that the UK “should not assume responsibility for more than
two provinces until additional and appropriate Coalition Forces are deployed. This needs
formal US/UK agreement”.
633.  In the SOR, Lt Gen Reith set out estimated force requirements for Basra, Maysan
and the four other provinces that might be included in an extended UK AOR:
Basra: a brigade HQ and three battlegroups with appropriate integral Combat
Support (CS) and Combat Service Support (CSS);
Maysan (grouped with Basra): a single battlegroup, supported by a Formation/
Light Reconnaissance (FR) Company;
Wasit: a brigade HQ and two battlegroups with appropriate CS and CSS;
Dhi Qar: a brigade HQ and two battlegroups with appropriate CS and CSS;
Diyala: a brigade HQ and three battlegroups with appropriate CS and CSS;
Muthanna: a brigade HQ and one battlegroup supported by an FR Company
with appropriate CS and CSS.
634.  Lt Gen Reith explained that the SOR offered “a starting point for discussion with
potential troop contributing nations”. It was “early days”:
“… Coalition Forces do not yet fully control all areas in SE Iraq. Thus, the SOR may
change and we will need to remain flexible. Much will depend on detailed ground
reconnaissance and the GOC’s intent.”
365  Minute Reith to PSO/CDS, 15 April 2003, ‘The Statement of Requirement (SOR) for SE Iraq’.
112
Previous page | Contents | Next page