Previous page | Contents | Next page
8  |  The invasion
orders in relation to the port of Umm Qasr, including the application of US labour and
customs laws, for which there was no clear legal authority. The position of UK forces,
if asked to participate in related activities, was therefore uncertain.
578.  Mr Llewellyn concluded:
“If it cannot be sorted out, we may well need a decision from Ministers about
whether UK forces should decline to take part in actions that we consider
unauthorised or unlawful.”
579.  The IPU sent recommendations on the UK’s future engagement with ORHA to
Mr Straw on 1 April.345
580.  The IPU advised that the UK objective of an Interim Iraqi Administration (IIA) acting
under UN authorisation was unlikely to be in place sooner than 90 days after the end of
hostilities.346 Until then, mechanisms were needed to deliver humanitarian assistance
and, within the relevant legal constraints, civil administration. Without such mechanisms,
those tasks would fall on the military, which had other priorities and limited resources.
581.  Because ORHA would administer the whole of Iraq as part of an integrated US-led
approach and had large resources at its disposal, it would not be viable for 1 (UK) Div to
operate “autonomously” in its AOR:
“We may wish to support 1 Div’s capacity to carry out specific actions (eg repairing
the water supply) in areas where we are responsible for maintaining security.
But the logic of ORHA – a nation-wide approach to Phase IV – limits the UK’s
responsibilities and exposure. Carving out a separate approach in a UK sector would
make no sense.”
582.  Depending on the circumstances, the UK could quite quickly be faced with “a grey
area of possible activities which could move ORHA beyond the UK’s understanding of an
Occupying Power’s rights and obligations”.
583.  The IPU concluded that, while ORHA was “in many ways a sub-optimal
organisation for delivering the UK’s Phase IV objectives”, it was “the only game in town”.
584.  Section 9.1 addresses UK concerns about the legality of ORHA activities in Iraq
in greater detail.
585.  The debate about the scale of the UK contribution to ORHA is addressed in
Section 10.1.
345  Minute IPU to Private Secretary [FCO], 1 April 2003, ‘Iraq: ORHA’.
346  Paper IPU, 28 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Office for Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance (ORHA)’.
103
Previous page | Contents | Next page