Previous page | Contents | Next page
8  |  The invasion
537.  For Wasit, Maysan and Dhi Qar provinces, the Annex stated that revenge and
retribution against the regime “could be high”. In Wasit it would represent “a sizeable
internal security issue”; in Maysan and Dhi Qar, a “short-term internal security issue”.
The section on Basra province stated:
“There will be some Iranian influence as the province shares a border with Iran …
Many tribes have been involved in anti-regime activities and, therefore, may be
pro-Western … Basra should be the most stable of the provinces in terms of threat
environment, but the size of the population will bring its own inherent problems.”
538.  The draft Operational Concept listed the military tasks for Phase IV, including:
maintaining a safe and secure environment;
supporting enforcement of the rule of law;
supporting humanitarian assistance and reconstruction;
supporting the interim civil administration;
helping with the restoration of communications infrastructure; and
supporting the transformation of Iraq’s armed forces.
539.  The draft provided broad estimates of force requirements, based on expected
levels of popular consent in each province.
540.  The draft assessed the impact of factors affecting the military tasks:
UK Capability … assuming internal tensions are high, initial operations are likely to
involve a continuous effort to preserve and maintain a consensual framework. This
will potentially require a brigade level of command for each province. At the present
scale of effort the UK has the capacity to do this, accepting some operational risk,
but at prejudice to our ability to reduce force levels in the short term …
“Iraqi Reactions. As internal tensions subside, consent in Iraq will grow dependent
on confidence in the US inspired IIA [Iraqi Interim Authority], engagement of
local Iraqi governance and growth of HA [Humanitarian Assistance]/immediate
reconstruction to improve the quality of life. The Iraqi population must also be
convinced that our presence is temporary. There is a direct link to our exit strategy
here; as consent in Iraq increases, force levels decrease.
“Expanding the Coalition. Even if a UNSCR is secured in good time, we will enter
Phase IV with few, if any, additional Coalition partners. Moreover IO and NGO
support is unlikely to be operating at full capability. This reinforces the critical
importance of an authorising UNSCR, allowing the wider internationalisation of our
presence in Iraq, and early bilateral engagement by the UK with potential force
contributors. In the medium term the UK may have to be prepared to bridge the gap
in force levels, maintaining a larger presence over a longer period of time than we
would wish …
97
Previous page | Contents | Next page