Previous page | Contents | Next page
8  |  The invasion
455.  Adm Boyce informed the Ad Hoc Meeting on Iraq on 14 April that the military
campaign was coming to an end and that Gen Franks had said the Coalition was within
a few days of declaring the switch to post-conflict operations.299 Adm Boyce had visited
British troops in the South who were “in good heart and demonstrating their flexibility in
dealing with the shifting security situation”. Consideration was being given to the security
management of the post-conflict phase, where the British Division might take charge of
two provinces and supervise a further two with other troops joining the Coalition for that
purpose.
456.  Mr Blair concluded that progress needed to be made on policing.300
457.  The issue of looting in Baghdad was also discussed in Mr Blair’s conversation with
President Bush on 14 April.301
458.  Mr Blair identified improving conditions in hospitals as the top humanitarian priority
and the main focus of media interest; Baghdad was still not a safe environment for
humanitarian assistance.
UK comments on levels of deployed US forces
Reporting on his visit to UK forces in Kuwait in early March 2003, Gen Jackson, wrote that
he had been “struck by just how little combat power the US have on the ground now that
4ID cannot deploy in time to influence the outcome”.302 The UK would have “a little under
one third of the available Coalition armour”. That combat power “may prove decisive for
operations around Baghdad”.
Admiral the Lord Boyce told the Inquiry that he was:
“… always extremely concerned about the anorexic nature of the American
contribution, and not just because the Fourth Infantry Division was taking a while
to get there, but because it was Rumsfeld’s view … that the Americans, certainly
at that particular stage … were very much, ‘We are here to do the war fighting, not
the peacekeeping.’ And combine that with the obsession that Mr Rumsfeld had with
network-centric warfare and therefore to prove that you could minimise the number
of your troops, in particular, because you had clever methods of conducting warfare,
other than using boots on the ground, meant that … we were desperately under-
resourced … so far as those forces going towards Baghdad were concerned.
“So, once the battle had been won, we didn’t have the boots on the ground to
consolidate.” 303
299  Minutes, 14 April 2003, Ad Hoc Meeting on Iraq.
300  Minutes, 14 April 2003, Ad Hoc Meeting on Iraq.
301  Letter, Cannon to McDonald, 14 April 2003, ‘Iraq: Prime Minister’s conversation with Bush, 14 April’.
302  Minute GCS to CDS, 10 March 2003, ‘CGS Visit to Op TELIC’.
303  Public hearing, 3 December 2009, page 100.
83
Previous page | Contents | Next page