Previous page | Contents | Next page
8  |  The invasion
In the context of consideration of preparations for a campaign of terrorism and sabotage
in the region, the Assessment also stated that:
“… we know that Iraqi Special Forces and other organisations, such as the ‘Saddam
Fedayeen’, also possess the capability to conduct sabotage or terrorist attacks.”
The JIC did not consider the Fedayeen’s possible actions inside Iraq.
In its weekly intelligence summary of 16 October, the DIS advised that, given the
limitations in Iraq’s capabilities:
“… the regime is leaning towards a war of attrition from within the cities. Provincial
cities have been garrisoned with food and troops … The regime’s aim is to lure
Coalition Forces into the cities and effectively fix them … Whilst Baghdad remains
the vital centre of gravity, Coalition Forces will look to bypass provincial centres,
leaving … Iraqi forces trapped …” 251
In its Assessment of 6 December, the JIC anticipated that the Iraqi Army could
establish positions within urban areas, but “most R[egular] A[rmy] defences are likely
to be constructed further forward, nearer Iraq’s borders, or along key roads and at
junctions”.252 Physical barriers, “water barriers (created by flooding or by the destruction
of bridges), minefields, or possibly even CBW-contaminated areas”, could be created “to
channel Coalition Forces into urban areas or ‘kill zones’ where artillery, or CBW, would
be used”. The Iraqi “strategy would rely heavily on a static defence, largely because
the Iraqi military’s ability to conduct manoeuvre warfare is very limited, even in the
R[epublican G[uard]”.
The JIC stated:
“… provided the security and military organisations central to the regime’s survival …
remained intact, Saddam would accept the sacrifice of virtually any forces or territory
to the coalition. Provincial cities would be defended, but ultimately we judge that only
Baghdad would be politically vital, as its capture would be a final symbol of defeat of
the regime.”
If the Special Republican Guard and the Republican Guard remained loyal and
effective, they could “inflict serious casualties on Coalition Forces in urban warfare”.
Morale and loyalty was “weak”. If a rapid Coalition advance left Iraqi positions behind
the front lines, “many RA [Regular Army] units would probably surrender rather
than fight”.”
The JIC Assessment of 29 January 2003 stated:
“[M]orale in much of regular army is low and … many soldiers are reluctant to fight.
But as long as Iraqi security officers remain with military units and able to enforce
discipline, fear of execution is likely to keep regular units at their posts.” 253
In a minute to Sir David Manning on 30 January (see Section 3.6), Mr Scarlett wrote that
the JIC had judged, “over many months”, that “once the invasion starts Saddam’s regime
251  Paper DIS, 16 October 2002, ‘Saddam and the Dilemma of the Republican Guard’.
252  JIC Assessment, 6 December 2002, ‘Iraq: Military Options’.
253  JIC Assessment, 29 January 2003, ‘Iraq: The Emerging View from Baghdad’.
73
Previous page | Contents | Next page