Previous page | Contents | Next page
8  |  The invasion
25 to 27 March: an operational pause
188.  On 25 March, Mr Blair raised the need for a media campaign to convince the
Iraqi people that the regime would collapse with President Bush.
189.  Concerns were also emerging about negative press reporting of the progress
of the campaign.
190.  A debate began about whether the fall of Basra should be given priority as a
way to contribute to the fall of the regime in Baghdad.
191.  Adm Boyce told the Ad Hoc Meeting on Iraq on 25 March that overcoming the
resistance of Iraqi irregulars in az-Zubayr would provide a good indication of how Basra
should be tackled.125 The fall of Basra would send a strong message, particularly when
combined with efforts to provide humanitarian relief to its inhabitants. But the bad
weather was likely to slow the advance on Baghdad.
192.  A minute to Sir David Manning, reporting the Chiefs of Staff meeting on 25 March,
stated that the Royal Marines were patrolling Umm Qasr in berets but that:
“Basra remains a conundrum: the commander of 1[UK] Div [Maj Gen Brims] has
yet to decide how best to proceed but planning for a number of options continues.
Situation should be clarified over the next 24 hours.” 126
193.  The Chiefs of Staff also discussed media issues. The minutes record a view that:
“… reporting from journalists in theatre gave a rather bleak outlook. Consideration
would be given to providing military context briefs to the embedded press corps and,
separately, to the ‘talking heads’ and opinion formers in London.” 127
194.  After the Chiefs’ discussion, Mr Ian Lee, MOD Director General Operational Policy,
wrote to Sir Kevin Tebbit and Adm Boyce, recording that he had pursued three themes
identified as:
the balance in media reporting and the need for a media programme which did
not give the appearance that the Government was “rattled”;
the information operations view of the “Basra/Baghdad relationship”; and
the “targeting of dual use communication media facilities”.128
195.  On information operations (IO), Mr Lee stated:
“… we discussed the strategic IO significance of Basra. In sum, the IO advice was
that the road to Baghdad leads through Basra. Not only would satisfactory removal
of regime elements from Basra send a message to Baghdad, it would have the
beneficial side effect (NB not an objective) of pacifying the impatient media.”
125  Minutes, 25 March 2003, Ad Hoc Meeting on Iraq.
126  Minute Gibbons to Manning, 25 March 2003, ‘Iraq: COS Tuesday 25 March’.
127  Minutes, 25 March 2003, Chiefs of Staff meeting.
128  Minute Lee to PS/PUS [MOD], PSO/CDS, 25 March 2003, ‘TELIC: Information Campaign’.
33
Previous page | Contents | Next page