Previous page | Contents | Next page
8  |  The invasion
173.  Mr Blair concluded that militia resistance in population centres did not appear
significant when set against the broad thrust of the campaign and the Coalition’s
achievements to date. The campaign was only 72 hours old and there was no case for
adjusting the presentational posture before it was known what pattern was developing
on the ground.
174.  By 24 March, UK forces controlled Basra Airport.118
175.  In preparation for a statement to Parliament by Mr Blair on 24 March, Mr Blair’s
Assistant Private Secretary provided a “note on military developments” which said:
“Pockets of resistance remain in the cities, particularly from hard-core regime
supporters … [The] city of Basra is surrounded, with airport in Coalition hands
(but significant resistance from hard-core regime supporters expected …).” 119
176.  In his statement, Mr Blair re-stated the UK’s “central objectives” as “to remove
Saddam Hussein from power” and ensure that Iraq was disarmed.120 The military
campaign to achieve those objectives was being conducted deliberately in a way
that “minimises the suffering of ordinary Iraqi people” and “to safeguard the wealth
of the country for the future prosperity of the people”. That was why the Coalition
had not mounted a heavy bombing campaign before the land campaign, and why
the immediate actions of the land forces had been to secure oil installations, which
had been mined. Had the Coalition not “struck quickly, Iraq’s future wealth would even
now be burning away”.
177.  Mr Blair said that the targets of the air campaign were the “infrastructure, command
and control of Saddam’s regime, not of the civilian population”. Water and electricity
supplies were “being spared” and there were “massive efforts to clear the lines of supply
for humanitarian aid”, although that was hindered by the presence of mines.
178.  In relation to the city of Basra, Mr Blair stated that the aim was to render it
“ineffective as a basis [sic] for military operations”. The city was “surrounded and cannot
be used as an Iraqi base”, but there were “pockets of Saddam’s most fiercely loyal
security services” in Basra who were “holding out”. They were “contained but still able to
inflict casualties … so we are proceeding with caution”. Basra Airport was “secure”.
179.  Mr Blair also said that:
The Coalition objective in the desert in the West was “to prevent Saddam from
using it as a base for hostile external aggression”.
In the North, the objective was to “protect people in the Kurdish Autonomous
Zone, to secure the northern oilfields and to ensure that the North cannot
provide a base for Saddam’s resistance”.
118  Ministry of Defence, Operations in Iraq: Lessons for the Future, December 2003.
119  Minute Cannon to Prime Minister, 24 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Military Developments’.
120  House of Commons, Official Report, 24 March 2003, columns 21-22.
31
Previous page | Contents | Next page