Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
386.  In the letter of 14 March 2003 from Lord Goldsmith's office to No.10, which is
addressed in Section 5 of the Report, Mr Blair was told that an essential ingredient of the
legal basis was that he, himself, should be satisfied of the fact that Iraq was in breach of
resolution 1441.
387.  In accordance with that advice, it was Mr Blair who decided that, so far as the UK
was concerned, Iraq was and remained in breach of resolution 1441.
388.  Apart from No.10’s response to the letter of 14 March, sent the following day,
in terms that can only be described as perfunctory, no formal record was made of that
decision and the precise grounds on which it was made remain unclear.
389.  The Inquiry was told, and it accepts, that it would have been possible at that stage
for the UK Government to have decided not to go ahead with military action if it had
been necessary to make a decision to do so; or if the House of Commons on 18 March
had voted against the Government.
390.  Although there had been unanimous support for a rigorous inspections and
monitoring regime backed by the threat of military force as the means to disarm Iraq
when resolution 1441 was adopted, there was no such consensus in the Security
Council in March 2003. If the matter had been left to the Security Council to decide,
military action might have been postponed and, possibly, avoided.
391.  The Charter of the United Nations vests responsibility for the maintenance of
peace and security in the Security Council. The UK Government was claiming to act on
behalf of the international community “to uphold the authority of the Security Council”,
knowing that it did not have a majority in the Security Council in support of its actions. In
those circumstances, the UK’s actions undermined the authority of the Security Council.
392.  A determination by the Security Council on whether Iraq was in fact in material
breach of resolution 1441 would have furthered the UK’s aspiration to uphold the
authority of the Council.
Decision-making
393.  The way in which the policy on Iraq was developed and decisions were taken and
implemented within the UK Government has been at the heart of the Inquiry’s work and
fundamental to its conclusions.
394.  The Inquiry has set out in Section 2 of the Report the roles and responsibilities
of key individuals and bodies in order to assist the reader. It is also publishing with the
Report many of the documents which illuminate who took the key decisions and on what
basis, including the full record of the discussion on Iraq in Cabinet on five key occasions
pre-conflict, and policy advice to Ministers which is not normally disclosed.
622
Previous page | Contents | Next page