Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
1160.  Mr Straw and Mr Hoon gave little detail of what UK forces would be required to do
immediately after the invasion:
“Much will depend on how the campaign develops, but in the first few weeks we
should expect Coalition forces to be spread across Iraq. The expectation is that UK
forces will end up in southern Iraq, loosely centred on Basra. However, we should
be prepared for elements of our forces to be dispersed fairly widely across Iraq …
“US military planning continues to be fluid. But it envisages Coalition forces
re‑deploying into a more tailored security framework as soon as the situation
permits. The military task will be to facilitate a secure environment (including law
and order, deterring adventurism and a variety of military-technical tasks) to enable
immediate humanitarian relief to be conducted. To help UK forces win hearts and
minds, HMT have allocated them £30m for humanitarian purposes in the first
month as well as £10m for quick win projects. (Clare [Short] has allocated £20m for
UN agencies’ preparations and earmarked another £60m from DFID’s contingency
reserve for humanitarian operations. But this is a drop in the ocean; in the worse
case, if the Oil-for-Food programme ground to a halt, Iraq could need as much as a
billion dollars a month for humanitarian aid.)
“The expectation is that UK forces would be responsible for a task focused on Basra
and other key military objectives in the South-East of Iraq, which could include
20 percent of the Iraqi population. This task is broadly proportionate to the size of
the UK’s contribution to overall Coalition land forces …
“In parallel, and under the overall military command, the US plan to bring in a
transitional administration500 to co-ordinate immediate civil relief and humanitarian
assistance. The transitional administration is making plans for allocating its limited
resources, including provision of public sector salaries, on a nation wide, Coalition
basis. There is no expectation that the UK would be asked to contribute any
resources to anything other than security. So there is no suggestion that the UK
would be left to foot the bill for the civil administration or the costs of humanitarian
relief and reconstruction in any area.”
1161.  Mr Straw and Mr Hoon reported that US planning remained “sensibly flexible”
once the initial phase was over and “a major part of Iraq has been stabilised”. It advised
that US planning:
“… recognises that parts of Iraq will be more permissive than others and that
security could well be provided through something other than sectors. It would
be premature now to take a view on the merits of sectors for this stage. We are
well placed to influence US thinking with a number of military officers and officials
embedded within their military headquarters and in ITCA. It would be helpful for
500 A footnote explained: “The Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance (ORHA) becomes the
transitional administration once it is established inside Iraq.”
518
Previous page | Contents | Next page