Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.5  |  Planning and preparation for a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq, January to March 2003
widely dispersed across Iraq, depending on how Phase III goes, because without
successful Phase III, Phase IV becomes harder, if not academic. The trick will be
to be able to regroup in a smaller area of SE Iraq once hostilities are ended.
“I also agree that we should be clear about our medium/long-term scale of military
commitment. While we are putting all we can into the war effort, we should plan
ahead to stay broadly within … [Strategic Defence Review guidelines].497
“What concerns me most is the process of transiting from a primarily military effort
to the civil-led longer-term humanitarian and reconstruction phase. Recent history
does not offer too much encouragement and we shall have to work hard to avoid
‘dependence culture’ on the armed forces to do things which should be for civil
departments – initially through aid, subsequently through Iraqi own efforts. The
politics of the issue do, I believe, point in the same direction. To meet the PM’s wish
for us to play an exemplary role, we shall need to remember that memories of the
UK in the region from the 1920s are not all positive, and we should make clear our
desire to hand over and withdraw on the right basis as early as we can.”498
1159.  In their joint minute, Mr Straw and Mr Hoon warned that some issues “could
confront us as early as next week” and invited agreement to five propositions:
“(a) The maximum size of task that UK forces would contribute to in the early days
should not exceed our overall military capability. A focus in the South-East of
Iraq would be reasonable.
(b) The UK contribution to such a task in advance of a Security Council resolution
would be limited to the facilitation of humanitarian assistance and a secure
environment and the elimination of WMD.
(c) We therefore need to agree urgently with the US a realistic authorising Security
Council resolution for post-conflict Iraq.
(d) We should agree urgently a plan with the US to help us find military partners
to enable us to draw down and, in due course, design an exit strategy.
(e) In broad terms the MOD will need to draw down its scale of effort to nearer
a third of its commitment by the autumn.”499
497 It is not clear whether Sir Kevin Tebbit referred to the Strategic Defence Review or the Defence
Planning Assumptions. The MOD has been unable to provide a version of Sir Kevin Tebbit’s manuscript
note including the missing words.
498 Manuscript comment Tebbit on Email DCMC CRISIS 04-S to CDS/PSO-S, 19 March 2003,
‘Joint Defence and Foreign Secretaries Minute to PM on “Sectors”’.
499 Minute Straw and Hoon to Prime Minister, 19 March 2003, ‘Iraq: UK Military Contribution to
post-conflict Iraq’.
517
Previous page | Contents | Next page