Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
Eclipse II – the CFLCC plan for Phase IV
The CFLCC plan for Phase IV, known as Eclipse II, was the product of the post-conflict
planning effort led by (acting) Major General Albert Whitley, CFLCC Deputy Commanding
General (Post Hostilities). Eclipse II had close links to CFLCC’s combat operations
planning, but not to broader Washington policy debates.424
After Saddam, the 2008 RAND report for the US Army on US post-conflict planning, stated
that Eclipse II had been through 15 revisions by the middle of March 2003, with the final
draft released on 12 April.425
The RAND report concluded that CFLCC “was gaining a realistic appraisal of the
potential security challenges that would confront Coalition forces”, but failed to challenge
military planning assumptions, including the degree to which the remnants of the Iraqi
Government would provide essential services and security.
In his written statement to the Inquiry, Maj Gen Whitley explained that Eclipse II was
named after the 1945 US plan for post-war Germany.426 It was “an attempt to produce
some coherence for the military aspects of Post Hostilities and give subordinate
commands, responsibilities, direction and tasks”. The “tiny” planning team in ORHA
produced the civil mirror image.
Maj Gen Whitley judged that the plan had “some local practical effect”, but was
“inadequate”.
989.  On 11 March, at the height of the UK’s effort to secure Security Council
backing for a second resolution (see Section 3.8), Mr Straw advised Mr Blair of
the need for a “Plan B” for the military in the event that the Government failed to
secure a majority in the Parliamentary Labour Party for military action.
990.  Mr Straw’s Plan B envisaged the UK “taking responsibility for a sector
and for humanitarian and reconstruction work” in order to make “a major UK
contribution to the overall campaign” without being directly involved in the
invasion.
991.  At that stage, officials were still pressing, without success, for Ministers to
agree draft objectives for post-conflict Iraq and principles to guide short-term UK
involvement that could be shared with the US.
992.  It is not clear whether Mr Straw had discussed the feasibility of his idea with
others.
993.  On 11 March, Mr Straw advised Mr Blair that he should not go to Parliament
seeking approval for military action unless he could be sure of a majority in the
424 Dale C. Operation Iraqi Freedom: Strategies, Approaches, Results and Issues for Congress.
Congressional Research Service, 15 December 2008.
425 Bensahel N, Oliker O, Crane K, Brennan RR Jr, Gregg HS, Sullivan T & Rathmell A. After Saddam:
Prewar Planning and the Occupation of Iraq. RAND Corporation, 2008.
426 Statement, 25 January 2011, page 12.
490
Previous page | Contents | Next page